Is this really a low quality photo?
Zulpha-PGO
Posts: 28 ✭✭
I'm very confused how this is low quality. You can see the building and clearly read on the sign what kind of building it's is or used for.
I'm very confused how this is low quality. You can see the building and clearly read on the sign what kind of building it's is or used for.
Comments
The only problem I see with this photo is that I am having trouble identifying the thing you are trying to submit. It looks like a field and the backside of some random building with a sign too far away for me to read.
Was trying to show the building as well as the sign. Didn't want to submit just a boring sign... The building itself looks beautiful.
I get so tired of reviewing signs of things and not the actual thing the sign is referring to... Don't know if anyone else feels this way.
I could try a different angle with the pictures but it's difficult to get one without people buzzing around the place. It's also currently used for COVID-19 vaccinations.
Ok that is a good thought but try again by standing next to the sign so it is readable in the foreground with the beautiful building taking up most of the photo in the background. The majority of the current photo is dying grass and sky. I like to take square phots for nominations like this where I set the aspect ration to 1:1 an can cut out most of the sky/ground.
Thank you for commenting. I will try again. Back then you had to take the picture while submitting. Now you can take it and upload later which helps allot :)
It isn't low quality. In the supporting image, take a picture of the sign. Try that
The pictures are not terrible but too far away , I can not read something.
Definitely get closer. The sign is around a 20th of the whole picture, and the building is maybe a 10th. That leaves 17/20ths of sky and ground.
Also, beware mentioning a game. It shouldn't matter in the Supporting, but some people downvote anyway.
Because reviewers are a fickle bunch, I often submit a boring sign as it's more likely to get accepted and then add a better picture after with the Add Photo option after it has gone live
This wasn't flagged as a problem this time around, but I wouldn't mention it's close to a primary school in the supporting info. You might get a K-12 rejection if reviewers aren't reading fully.