information on public bulletin boards
Gatsu8618-ING
Posts: 28 ✭✭
Hi everyone,
I open this post to get information on various public bulletin boards (of which I will put some sample photos) placed in parks, public gardens, important streets of the country. I had read that they were valid but I keep failing in bursts.
Then the doubt arises as to who is wrong, me to name them or who evaluates with their feet.
Thanks for the clarification
Comments
In my opinion, there are two kind of public bulletin boards, the ones that contain advertisements, which I don`t see as something with interest, and the other ones containing information of social or cultural interest, which I see as good candidates.
I see al the ones you shared as acceptable except the third one, it just has advertisements of houses.
I could have said that in a better way than you did @ElseSense-PGO !
Agreed on every point. All of these one are good candidates excepted the third.
Bulletin boards are definitely acceptable, but they're very difficult to get accepted because most reviewers don't read forums and don't realize this. It would be helpful if Niantic could include them as one of the examples on the Wayfarer Criteria page.
I agree with the third, I was very doubtful whether to send it or not. An attempt I wanted to try it but I would not have given us hope. What saddens me is that, for the others, even if they are valid, I am losing months and many requests but the results are always the same.
Thanks
They can be, depending on the content, as the others have said. Including one as an example may confuse people into thinking any old noticeboard is eligible.
Good point, but some small elaboration such as "Information boards with community events (not advertisements)" could help.
As others have said, all but the third should go through.
You might have difficulty with the 4th one too as many people will reject information boards that have nothing on them. It is still an info board though and will have had/will have local info on it at some point but many voters find any silly reason to reject submissions