Welcome to the Bug Reporting page! Please refer to these tips when submitting new bug reports:
1. Browse the known issues section or check if another user previously posted about a similar issue.
2. Upvoting posts help us understand how many players are experiencing the bug.
3. Refer to the Best Practices to learn how to write a bug report.
4. File each issue separately if you’ve encountered multiple issues.
1. Browse the known issues section or check if another user previously posted about a similar issue.
2. Upvoting posts help us understand how many players are experiencing the bug.
3. Refer to the Best Practices to learn how to write a bug report.
4. File each issue separately if you’ve encountered multiple issues.
Wayfarer effectively dead due to mass & random invalid rejection reasons
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Recht hart ausgedrückt, aber wahr. Prinzipiell ist es eher ein running g4g, genau wie die ganzen Murals, die keine Murals sind. Ich bezweifle, dass da in diesem Falle ernsthaft jemand deswegen ablehnt, aber Punktabzug in der konkreten Kategorie geben viele, denk ich.
Lattenjupp ist übrigens auch kein Titel, den man hier verwenden sollte.
I realy don't think it's the Problem of the name. The problem is trolling or her made some adjusting to the system.
I have over 750 approved POI and a rate of 8/10 approved, but only 3 got approved in this year.
Den Titel INRI sehe ich jetzt nicht so eng, zumal es bei den meisten Kreuzen mit dabei steht. In dem Fall ja auch. Momentan ist es aber egal was man dahin schreibt, vielleicht würde der Lattenjupp ja durchgehen ;-) Finde es eher wieder spannend, dass in meinem Showcase 3 Wegweiser angezeigt werden, bei denen sich normal die Geister auch scheiden und die Mehrheit sagt die gehören abgelehnt. Nun ja, Niantic muss es ja wissen.
I don't see the title INRI that narrowly now, especially since it is included in most of the crosses. In that case too. At the moment it doesn't matter what you write there. I find it rather exciting again that 3 signposts are displayed in my showcase, where opinions are normally divided and the majority says they should be rejected. Well, Niantic should know.
The system needs adjustment, that's for sure. Something's just not right at the moment. Especially for people in southern germany and the adjacent countries. I would consider a lot of the latest rejected Wayspots 5* no brainers, but for some reason they are rejected even multiple times. I can understand your frustration
I would probably rate your nomination 4/5 stars in every category and I would think it would get easily accepted under normal circumstances, sadly we don't have those right now
Wo sagt das welche Mehrheit? Jegliche organisierte Gruppe mit erfahrenen Bewertern drin sollte eig genau das gegenteil propagieren.
Die Deutschen (und Tschechen und Polen) sind nur leider seit eh und je zu blöd diesbezüglich die Kriterien zu lesen. Wanderwegweiser waren schon immer drin aufgeführt, dass die anzunehmen sind (soferns nicht der hinterletzte mickrige kram ist). Das war ganz früher zu ING-Zeiten schon so, aber erst mit dem Erscheinen der Support-Texte ging es los, dass man sie zuverlässig durchbekommen hat mithilfe von lehrreichen Support-Texten mit Beweislink. Seit PoGo aber mitbewerten darf, ist das Wanderwegweiser business aber wieder so kacke wie ganz zu Anfang ...
IT IS official . People are rejecting These Christian Symbols because they are offended.
@NianticDanbocat @NianticGiffard should we ask for removal of churches?
Und genau das ist das Problem, ich hab das Gefühl es wird nur frei aus dem Bauch heraus bewertet und nicht nach den gültigen Kriterien. Ich weiß, dass Wanderwegweiser, sofern nicht klein und mickrig, gültige Kandidaten sind, genauso wie Brücken die an Wanderwegen liegen. War auch mal Thema in einer AMA, war 2019 wenn ich mich recht erinnere.
Aber danke für das Teilen Deiner Erfahrung. Ich bin erst seit PoGo mit dem Bewerten dabei.
And that's exactly the problem, I have the feeling that it's just being evaluated based on gut instinct and not according to the valid criteria. I know that trail markers, unless small and puny, are valid candidates, as are bridges on trails. Was also a topic in an AMA, was 2019 if I remember correctly.
But thanks for sharing your experience. I've only been in the process of rating since PoGo.
Rejected due to Inaccurate Location. It's hard to believe that a humanoid reviewer has chosen this reason. I mean look at the support image and the explanation in additional info. Translated: Position can be inferred from the street signs in support image (Waisenhausstr./Am Steinberg).
How can you miss both the support image AND the additional info?
Incredible outlooks! No wonder eligible nominations gets rejected over and over when such delusional people are reviewing.
This is bug section, not nomination improvement. No one asked for ur wild guesses and the search for the fly in the ointment. **** up other threads. Dislikes show that this behaviour is highly inappropriate ...
I dont know how often exactly this dumb behaviour of you now happened in this forum but again: you are undermining other peoples efforts based on thumbnails ..... srsly?
Im beginning to think Niantic have added extra weight to reviewers who have done more voting, to the point where one or two reviewers can get a portal rejected while everyone else voted to accept.
My reasoning is that the silly rejections stopped for two or three weeks recently like someone was on holiday but started again in many areas like they had returned.
This among with other observations. One for example being a recent rejection based on no pedestrian access. I can see one person being special enough to say this because of no paths but not many voters because it's obvious in the surround shot there are pedestrians there having a pint and there is a sign saying customer entrance, so it Obviously has pedestrian access. Like I say, I can see one silly person voting to reject despite it obviously being safe but not loads or the majority.
@NianticDanbocat @NianticGiffard
That is exactly the Case.
That 1-2 persons are likely to Review with 5-7 Accounts simultaneusly.
Thanks for the discussion everyone!
I will be closing this thread after looking at several comments and I fear that might contribute towards toxicity. As I've said earlier, we've received a lot of similar reports from various spaces and looking into all the rejections in great detail. One of us will comment back once we have conducted our analysis and reached a conclusion.