One area, or two wayspots?
CopperCog-ING
Posts: 29 ✭✭
This ball court became a discussion today. From what @NianticGiffard said in a different thread, if a playground wasn’t seperated by a walkway, it would be a dupe. So, what about this ball court: it’s one half court and one full court basketball, on one slab of asphalt. I would say, if nominated as the red x’s indicate, one would be a dupe.
Comments
I would see them as only one wayspot.
For example, when nominating a tennins court, even if there is more than one, you just nominate the court.
Kind of, but not quite, I would still follow what was said by NianticGiffard, because if there are multiple fields visible in a park one does not make it a duplicate of the other because there indeed are two, however, in this case is a little different since one is a half field dedicated for practice and the other is a full field. Where I see it struggling is being visually distinct, and are connected to each other.
What the others said. And, it's one piece of concrete.
Haven’t been there myself, i only know in Norway we often use asphalt for courts like that :)
One. Otherwise you end up with the type of submissions I have seen where people try to nominate the goalposts at each end of a soccer pitch as separate Waypoints ("North Goalposts / South Goalposts").
If I saw these nominations I would label one a duplicate.
That said, other athletic fields adjacent to each other - soccer pitches, baseball diamonds - are OFTEN accepted as separate waypoints. So I’m sure some segment of reviewers would have no more issue with ‘half court’ and ‘full court’ being different POIs any more than they do with ‘sport field 1,’ ‘sport field 2,’ that are all right next to each other.