Nomination Improvement Suggestions Please

I've had this contribution rejected but can't understand why. It's a safe recreational area that many people use for play and dog walking. There's a footpath running through and it's not a sensitive area at all.

Any suggestions appreciated.


Comments

  • sogNinjaman-INGsogNinjaman-ING Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13

    There is nothing in your photo that meets any criteria. Parks etc need an "anchor point" for the Waypoint - usually a sign or similar. A "Public Footpath" similarly is not eligible. Your nomination is just showing a patch of grass and some pavement - 1* does not meet criteria. "Lack of Pokestops" is not a reason for approval of any stop, and a lot of reviewers find this sort of comment annoying.

  • JillJilyJabadoo-PGOJillJilyJabadoo-PGO Posts: 634 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see a sign far in the background of your main photo. If it happens to be a sign about the park (assuming that's what you mean by "recreational area") it could work as the anchor for the park.

  • CipherBlakk-PGOCipherBlakk-PGO Posts: 308 ✭✭✭✭

    While you don't actually need a specific object as an anchor for a park (it's a place of exploration and exercise just by itself), it's practically necessary for getting something approved. Is there some kind of signage at the beginning or end of the path? If you can't find something, this might be a hard sell.

Sign In or Register to comment.