Invalid Wayspots appeal (Incheon, South Korea)

Common items for all invalid Wayspots

  • City: Incheon
  • Country: South Korea (Republic of Korea)


In this post, I report 9 invalid Wayspots.




No.1

Title of the Wayspot: "수달가족"

Location: 37.389142,126.648188

Reason: This mascot was demolished in 2015. Instead, the "송도 컨벤시아 가족 조각상" below was created. Please retire this Wayspot.





No.2

Title of the Wayspot: "송도 컨벤시아 가족 조각상"

Location: 37.388883,126.648535

Reason: It is 35 meters away from its original location.

Correct Location: 37.3889,126.64814





No.3

Title of the Wayspot: "무지개를 넘어 솟아오르다"

Location: 37.394934,126.651072

Reason: Someone's face was exposed on Wayspot photo. It doesn't meet Wayfarer's standards. Besides, the location is also incorrect. Its original location (37.394704,126.650777) is 36 meters away. Please delete this Wayspot.






No.4

Title of the Wayspot: "푸르지오 벽화"

Location: 37.391898,126.645465

Reason: A wall that was temporarily erected during the construction of a building. Naturally, it was removed a long time ago. Please retire this Wayspot.





No.5

Title of the Wayspot: "드림교회"

Location: 37.469128,126.69254

Reason: This church went out of business in 2021, and the "좋은 교회" below took its place. Please retire this Wayspot.





No.6

Title of the Wayspot: "좋은교회"

Location: 37.469077,126.692214

Reason: This place is an apartment, not a church. Its original location is 37 meters away.

Correct Location: 37.469072,126.692643





No.7

Title of the Wayspot: "정자"

Location: 37.472483,126.686303

Reason: As the old factory went out of business and different company moved in in 2017, this gazebo was demolished. Please retire this Wayspot.





No.8

Title of the Wayspot: "강아지 벤치"

Location: 37.472423,126.692495

Reason: Dangerously, this Wayspot is located on the car road.

Correct Location: 37.472442,126.692235





No.9

Title of the Wayspot: "큐피드화살벤치"

Location: 37.471352,126.690983

Reason: Oddly enough, this Wayspot is at a crosswalk. Even Street View could not confirm the existence of this bench. This Wayspot should be deleted.


Tagged:

Comments

  • MissingJessica-INGMissingJessica-ING Posts: 2 ✭✭

    Wow! "Its original location (37.394704,126.650777) is 36 meters away. Please delete this Wayspot."

    Your request is just amazing. Guys, see what he is doing. Unbelievable!

    Keep going :D

  • growgi-PGOgrowgi-PGO Posts: 188 ✭✭
    edited March 2022


    Hi @MissingJessica-ING. Thank you for leaving me the first comment as soon as you signed up.

    Please read everything I have written.


    • Reason: Someone's face was exposed on Wayspot photo. It doesn't meet Wayfarer's standards.


    There is no need to delete this Wayspot if someone can upload another the photo.

    If there is no face exposure, the wayspot needs to be repositioned, not deleted.

  • MissingJessica-INGMissingJessica-ING Posts: 2 ✭✭

    Thank you for your quick reply.


    I disagree with your comment.

    Yes, if someone's face was exposed on the photo, then Niantic can easily delete that photo.

    My idea is that you don't need to say "Please delete this wayspot".

    I'm wondering why you used the word, "delete".

    I doubt if you have any other specific intention(s) on "deleting" that wayspot and other wayspots in Incheon.


    Secondly, there are tons of portals which includes someone's face, which is "even" made by @DongHaeRang. Check who DongHaeRang is.

    Oh, then all those portals which include someone's photos, somebody's cars should be deleted? Ok then keep going. Please delete all the wayspots as you want. Please delete all the terrible portals in Europe, which does not meet the Wayspot criteria.


    Third, anyway, Niantic's reaction is the most important thing. That shows the result. Check what happened in Songdo-****. I'm sure you will check Niantic's answer.


    Lastly, I will not check your respnose cuz I'm not interested in what you are doing. So you don't need to reply on this. But I'm 100% sure that you will write reply on this. Right? lol.

    Yeah, do what as you want. But please reconsider what you are doing. Plus, check the Niantic's reaction, not just writing posts like a machine.

  • growgi-PGOgrowgi-PGO Posts: 188 ✭✭

    To @MissingJessica-ING


    Yes you are right. I leave a comment.

    If you are willing, please answer only this part.

    Check what happened in Songdo-****.

    I don't know what happened in Songdo. Just give me the title or link of the discussion and I will definitely read it. 😉


    Now, I will write what I want to write. As you said, you are under no obligation to confirm my opinion or reply to me.




    My idea is that you don't need to say "Please delete this wayspot".

    I'm wondering why you used the word, "delete".

    I requested that Wayspot be deleted in fear that the photo will not be changed and only the location will be relocated. I will think more about it when I write.




    I doubt if you have any other specific intention(s) on "deleting" that wayspot and other wayspots in Incheon.

    Please see the list of posts I have written so far.

    I am not writing for Incheon alone. I are also reporting on other cities.




    Secondly, there are tons of portals which includes someone's face, which is even made by DongHaeRang. Check who DongHaeRang is.

    ??? Who is DonghaeRang? I can't figure out anything from the Ingress link you wrote. Is he famous in Ingress? But I didn't play Ingress, only Pokemon go.

  • Thanks for the appeal, @growgi-PGO! After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve taken necessary action on the Wayspots in question.

  • HINABITAMEU-INGHINABITAMEU-ING Posts: 154 ✭✭✭

    무슨 이유로 제 글에 코멘트를 남겼는지 모르겠지만

    단순하게 제가 글을 쓴 이유는 심사하다가 비슷한 이름의 wayspot을 지속적으로 봤기 때문입니다.

    그 근처에 살지 않으므로 무슨 일이 일어나는지, 누가 하는지 모릅니다(대충 짐작은 가지만)

  • growgi-PGOgrowgi-PGO Posts: 188 ✭✭
    edited March 2022

    제가 댓글을 달았던 16854번 토론(https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/16854/suspected-intentional-abuse-of-codename-insertion)은 어디까지나 @HINABITAMEU-ING님께 연락을 하기 위해서 방문한 것이며, 16854번 토론에 관해서는 전혀 궁금하지 않습니다.


    제가 묻고자 하는 내용은 지금 보고 있는 29999번 토론의 148544번 댓글 (https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/comment/148544#Comment_148544)입니다.

  • HINABITAMEU-INGHINABITAMEU-ING Posts: 154 ✭✭✭

    사진이야 교체하면 그만이라서, 예전에 생긴 저화질 사진이 있는 wayspot이라도 삭제보다는 사진교체를 하는 것이 좋을 것 같습니다.

  • growgi-PGOgrowgi-PGO Posts: 188 ✭✭

    분명 16854번 토론(https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/16854/suspected-intentional-abuse-of-codename-insertion)에서도 그렇고 저는 "송도동에서 무슨 일이 일어났는지"에 대해서 몇 번이나 되묻고 있는데 계속해서 회피성 댓글만 작성하시는군요.

    송도야 예전부터 문제가 심한 것은 개인적으로도 알고 있었지만, 부계정으로 송도동 얘기를 꺼내시길래 여쭤본 것이었습니다.

    일주일 기다려봤고 같은 질문을 여러 번 드려봤는데도 결과가 이러하니 답변할 의사가 없는 것으로 이해하겠습니다.

Sign In or Register to comment.