Information sign rejected.
ZinkyZonk-ING
Posts: 283 ✭✭✭✭
The world is full of awful things to complain about. Especially now with so much of the world affected by Covid.
Yet here is a whinge ..... I just want to make portals I don't want the the yolk of unreasonable rejections.
So passionate about portal submission but I just can't take this bs up again. Wayfarer hurts. It's been hurting for so long. This was an excellent portal submission. I could find and discover poi for days. just this community decision thing is a heap of ......
The grass area is now a car park. The bay islands are not bridged and there's quite the demand for parking. Council development plan for the Wienam Creek Area is the first search results shown.
I just can't be part of this process anymore.
Comments
Which rejection reasons are named in the rejection mail? For me this looks like a 5* POI.
Also looks like it's in a person's back yard.
It needs a good supporting photo so the location can be established easily.
Re-photograph it and see how you go.
Live 20 kms away from this spot. Not likely to be able to rephoto it any time soon. It's a heavy RES area (not that it matters) and I have 35 portals closer within 4 km of home to submit (- if I could be bothered. )
Wieman creak is named on the map above. title of portal is: Intertidal zone and estuary .... exactly where the pin is. Where the sea becomes the creek. kinda obvious
If wanting to check location and there's known a difference with sat view especially with a new shiny sign without fading or tagging ..... Anyone would be able to google the Wienam creek and get info that it's been under development.
Anyway wayfarer is a small problem (especially when you quit)
not as big as texas .... what crazy is that?
A public utility given to corporations? And those corporations failing to provide service to their clients? On a mass scale? Because they failed to plan for bad weather after other previous occasions of bad whether. Leaders going on holidays during the crisis.
Wow!
show us photo nr2
so the car parks and boat parking the just under Auster street are complete. The walk way over the creek is complete too. The plan to the the north is unrealised at this time.
This could have been rejected because the reviewers were not able to find the location on the map.
It seems that the satellite image is to old to reflect the changes. My immediate thought when reviewing would be that someone is trying to get a homestop in his backyard
The land looks like it will be developed on the sat view. Your immediate conclusion is within the range of possible conclusions but it is definitely on the cynical end.
As the marker is at the tree line of the creek, at the point of estaury where you would expect such a sign to be, and the property has a well defined fence near the house at 11 Auster signifying the yard of the last house is well back from the marker ....surely the backyard conclusion is not the most thought out?
I can't do this wayfarer thing anymore. it's too hard. It's been hard from the beginning and I don't want to do it any more. I quit months ago like an absolute idiot I keep trying. It's just not a safe process for someone who likes their efforts not to go to waste.
Appeal accepted at least Niantic can read a map. A sign about weinam creak estuary being next to the Weiman creek estuary. Fancy that!
pity it had to be appealed, but good to know that the appeal worked.
tbh, to me it looked like a wayspot conveniently placed in the backyard.
This is not someone’s backyard. And you think he made that sign?
You can see easily that reviewers would reject as being in a back yard with no proof of this being the case even though there is enough circumstantial evidence saying it probably does exist there.
This once again shows that voters are biased towards rejecting and voting with the mentality that everything is fake unless proven otherwise, rather than then having to prove its fake.
I had named trail marker rejected which had the name written on it which could only have been in a small unique area of the same name yet it got rejected for mismatched location.
Still the same old issues
this definitely should've been approved I think the problem might have been your description. the description should tell us more about the information that is on the sign
For anyone who hasn't learned how to make photospheres yet, I highly recommend it. It's well worth the time and not difficult to learn. Plus it's great for mental health by saving all the frustration of good nominations being rejected as fakes or location not found.