Suspected abuse of refusal to nominate
HANGUYENHN-PGO
Posts: 8 ✭✭
(21.0058383, 105.7436348)
This is a sports and cultural center. where the mass cultural sports activities take place, there are indoor gymnasiums and outdoor sports. Good image, high community cultural value, streetview. In addition, there are many good quality nominations that are continuously rejected after very fast invoting. large number of people in the community submit feedback about the same situation with many unconvincing reasons. We'll try to bring this back up but expect the publisher to find out about this behavior bug or the rating system.
Comments
A lot of reviewers believe that photos taken at night are automatically "low-quality photos" and will reject as such. Take a photo during the day and resubmit.
Try nominating it as "unique architecture", the second bullet point here: https://wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/new/criteria/eligibility
Yeah what they said night photos typically get hit with low quality photo rejection. If you can you might want to use any optical zoom on the camera you used as the sign is a bit hard to read. This might also be cleared up with better lighting.
definitely a viable submission under the great place to socialize criteria
I want to make it clear that night photography is not low quality. there needs to be an answer from admin because people just trust it. many language problems in countries where English is not good. I took the initiative to submit a nomination in the evening as an example (everyone knows to **** during the day with good light). I want an answer from the admin to send a message to the community there in my country ! Can anyone tag admin?
If you mean this forum mods, they're rarely answering to criteria clarification questions or just tell why your nomination got rejected. Have you tried nomination appeal?
the photo was taken in the morning but was NOT ACCEPTED for the reason of Low Quality Photo.
Also, my nomination was NOT ACCEPTED for the reason of Fake Nomination when it was in the right place for nomination
I have already appeal but have not seen the result of the appeal
It's sad that this appeal mode is as well as not
There is an old post by @NianticCasey-ING where they clearly stated that so long as the photo is good enough to identify what is being nominated, it should not be rejected as "low-quality". But few ever paid attention to it at the time and instead of taking the description of "low-quality photo" literally (pitch black, blurry, or taken from a car), started making up their own interpretation of what a "low-quality photo" was.
Just got news that the Casey has retired 🥲
It takes 3-6 months to get results after protesting. I suspect rj is currently being used to raise badge stats and get quick up @NianticDanbocat
I don't like photos taken at night
Daytime photos are better than nighttime
Just because you don't like nighttime photos doesn't mean you should reject a nomination for "low-quality photo". So long as what is being nominated is identifiable, that is good enough.
take the picture during the day time and see if that works
What matters is perception, not action.
Does that mean that you don't want to take a photo with daylight?
@HANGUYENHN-PGO
you say….
What matters is perception, not action.
Its a bit puzzling but the bottom line is that ….
What matters is the nomination is accepted, by presenting it well.
This means setting aside our own ideas of what a well presented case is and amending it until you have a case that will work.
We all get caught up in our own submissions, looking at them through rose tinted glasses, convinced they are perfect (why else would you submit) but someone else looking at it for the first time, like any reviewer, can see things differently.
That’s why this space is useful.