Request to merge spots that were posted multiple times at the same time

Spot title:中華そば萬福
Location :34.940515,135.748959
City:Kyoto
Country:Japan
At the time of my review, there were already two spots with the same name.
The position of the existing spot and the photo are exactly the same.
I rejected the new candidate as a duplicate.
It is likely that the same person submitted multiple applications at the same time, and the second was approved before the first was approved.
Responsibility lies with the contributor who submitted multiple submissions at the same time, and I don't think the reviewers were aware of this.
I would like to see it integrated in one place.
Post edited by NianticOren on
Tagged:
Comments
@NianticAaron @NianticLC
I'm pushing it because it got buried in other discussions.
Please consider integrating Wayspot.
Thanks for reaching out, @82quuu-PGO! It looks like we haven’t gotten to this request yet or it hasn’t been submitted via the Scanner; at this time, we only take appeals to overturn decisions we’ve already made.
@NianticOtoStar
Thank you.
I'm far from this location and it's difficult to use the scanner locally.
Even if I could go there, it would be difficult to request because there are two Wayspots in the same place.
What should reviewers do when they find such cases in the future?
Hey @82quuu-PGO, Please reach out to our dedicated team using the following link and they will be able to assist you accordingly: https://www.pokemongolive.com/report-location
Thanks,
I checked with the Wayfarer app. It appears to be a duplicate in the exact same place. So much so that I can only tap one Wayspots. I don't know if this is abuse or not, but please report it via Wayfarer Support chat at the bottom right of the Help tab, or Report Wayfarer abuse -> Fake Nominations or Criteria Issues. I think one will be removed as it is a duplicate.
This is the issue your team should've take action of. What's the point of asking any in-game supports if the said Wayspot doesn't appear in any game (likely) due to inclusion rules?
Thanks for confirming.
This duplicate spot is similar in content to a discussion someone else opened a few days ago with the content "infinite spam".
This is a rough method that if you nominate a lot, one of them will be approved.
Even a bad gun hits a few shots.
Some are considered approved because the reviewers are unaware of that fact until approval.
One of these multiple Wayspots seems to be a gym in Pokemon GO.
I reviewed the third Wayspot application from a place far away from this ramen shop.
Since I can't go there, I had no choice but to seek help from the community.
I thought I posted about deleting a dead spot, but I accidentally posted it in the general discussion.