Dark/blurry photos

Title of the Wayspot: Blaue Stampfer
Location: 53.061147,8.865468
City: Bremen, Germany
Photos to support your claim:
Additional information: While the blueish light enhances the wayspot at night, I don't think some of the uploaded photos are really good. They are either too dark to recognize anything or blurry. The other two day/night photos are good. Would argue to remove three of them.
Tagged:
Comments
Why do you want to delete photos? Different players contributed, not everyone had new phones, keep it for the history. Vote for your favourite to make it the main photo, that's it.
Also keep in mind, recent bug in scanner makes all photos look extra blurry. Wait until it's fixed.
Just general wayspot maintenance here and there. Any reason why you have asked me this question but to nobody else in this part of the forum?
no, nothing personal,
1) I like night photos, and Blaue Stampfer photos are cool! They look blurry in scanner because of recent scanner bug, but the full resolution photos (add "=s0" to intel image) are much better:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/czuni7qDSMJ1vSI2FGtLjtTS2IrysdXb1WAC2IteG0flA_IYBugZw7GkSaSOPzHkkkW0GmGM-yQunjFfbwR2kytuGHk=s0
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/uJp-QpKd9CnGNCrKHkiKLqbObp4y2iwNNaStu5UKU1f7v2APvW1HYVjwNTt4XoD3obo6qoMUil3vlW2fILduU53dn4I=s0
2) usually players request to delete photos when photos are wrong (added from duplicated wayspot, or outdated), or there is some concern (faces, third party photos). It's not typical to request delete when different photo can be upvoted instead.
I am not aware of any scanner bug. As far as I see it, that's the way the photos are supposed to be depicted in the game and that quality alone counts. Never seen the option ingame to add "=s0" to an image. If I had some of these pictures new in wayfarer I would decline them due to their quality. Good night time pictures are possible, but it doesn't mean that every one of them is good enough. Also, I don't think you have described your last argument well. Every photo ingame can be upvoted, even those with faces or third party ones. I am not sure what kind of argument you are trying to make.
I don't see any photos that are bad enough to be removed. All of these depict the point of interest and they are recognizable. If you dislike them, don"t vote for them and you should never see them again unless you're looking for them.
I do accept your opinion as your own and seeing your thread on "low quality photo rejection reasons" I also understand your general stance in this issue.
Personally I think some of the photos simply do not depict the wayspot well enough. In the case of the night photos, without the lights you wouldn't recognize anything and with them, it basically becomes "some object with blue lights shining on it" if not put well in frame. A night photo has to be done well to work and then I am happy to accept it myself.
"Well enough" is your personal opinion and preference. Please don't clog the already huge backlog on the forum by trying to force your opinion on eveeyone else.
With this post you are overstepping the boundaries between normal wayfarer. Please do not try to impose your will upon mine. The forum is there to bring out issues which we believe should be taken care off. That's exactly what I am doing.
Thanks for the appeal, @ftzzghzuhdidu-ING! Based on the evidence provided, we’ve removed the invalid images of the Wayspot.