4/29 Usson-Du-Poitou - France - Fake/faux Portails/pokestop
des végétaux qui aiment l'eau
46.271654,0.575865
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.27156217238903,0.5763986706733704&z=18
Issue.
The sign is not accessible or visible from the road as indicated by Apple's map.
It is not possible to see the sign on Apple's Plan neither on the left nor on the right.
On the satellite view the panel does not exist. In addition, the position of the panel is in the open field.
Comparing the photos, trees exist. But by observing the satellite photo there is nothing.
The land is a plowed field which implies that there cannot be a sign.
List of duplicates that have the same panels, down to the smallest blades of grass. But that's not possible.
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.718025,-1.263047&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.543317,0.284129&z=15
Conclusion.
The point of interest should not have been validated but refused at least for five reasons: Farm, pedestrian access, does not exist at the indicated place, false proposal and duplicate
—-
Problème.
Le panneau n’est pas accessible ni visible depuis la route comme l’indique Plan d’Apple.
Il est impossible de voir le panneau sur Plan d’Apple ni à gauche ni à droite.
Sur la vue satellite le panneau n’existe pas.
De plus, la position du panneau est en plein champ.
En comparant les photos, des arbres existent. Or en observant la photo satellite il n’y a rien. La terre est un champ de labour ce qui implique qu’il ne peut y avoir de panneau.
Liste des doublons qui possèdent les mêmes panneaux et cela jusqu’aux moindres brins d’herbes. Or c’est pas possible.
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.718025,-1.263047&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.543317,0.284129&z=15
Conclusion.
Le point d’intérêt n’aurait pas dû être validé mais refusé au moins pour cinq justifications : Ferme, accès piéton, n’existe pas à l’endroit indiqué, fausse proposition et doublon.






Comments
Thanks for the appeal, @Soccalala-PGO. After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve decided to retire the Wayspot in question and have taken action on the Wayfinder in accordance with our policies.