Mismatch and location accuracy
Hi all,
I’m new here and not a native English speaker. If there is any mistake, please let me know. Thanks!
After reading the guidance, my explanation of the location accuracy is:
1*/mismatch → “Undoubtedly, It is a fake wayspot”
2* → “I think it is a fake wayspot, but I don’t have the evidence”
3* → “It may or may not be there”
4* → “There are some clues that show it exists or it is not far away”
5* → “It is the exact location”
I’m not sure whether my explanation is correct. If the explanation is correct, there is a problem. In the Chinese version of Wayfarer. They translated mismatch to “地點不符”, which means not the exact location. All of the 1* to 4* could fit into this category.
According to the record from the local group, many reviewers rated “mismatch” as long as they couldn’t find the exact location. If my explanation is correct, I suggest that change it to stronger tones. For example, “惡意偽造地點”, which means providing the fake location intentionally. And also provide guidance on the review page.
If there is any misunderstanding, please let me know. Thanks!
Answers
Everything you said sounds fine, I think it is a good proposal.
Pretty much, though 3 star us also used if say, the area on Google maps was under construction at the time or there was a construction after so while its not possible to tell from the maps it most likely will still be there (tend to find a lot of play gorinds will have that issue)