French reviewers are....
Klosawer-PGO
Posts: 17 ✭✭
Hello community, I need to understand why this one was rejected..
The only reason is because the plaque is on the front of a high school. But it is is the street, not inside. I do not put the word "lycée" high school in the text just because I know people are dumb. So why?
Maybe in maps we see lycée Jean baptiste de baudre ?.. I'm tired of rejected valid nomination and tired of seeing stupid nomination in the game.
So please what can I do to improve that nomination? 🙏
Comments
maybe because of the school right next to it. I sadly canot understand french, but i think, the description looks very good with its lengh. So the school will be the declined-criteria. POI yes, but bad location.
I was confused as well until you mentioned that it's on a high school. Anything on primary or secondary (K-12) school grounds is to be rejected. This includes things attached to the outer walls of the school, regardless of whether there is public access. Those are just the rules. The rejection was correct.
Outter walls too? Can you gimme the link to this rule? If it's in the ama, none of French reviewers read them..
For the rules are these :
Not eligible "proposals placed inside the enclosure of a school (6-10 yo), college (11-14) or highschool (15-18)".
It's not inside.
Outer walls are considered to be part of school area.
The same text in English.
"Nominations whose real-world location appears to be on the grounds of primary/secondary schools, child care centers, or daycare centers"
Walls are part of the property, same as those 20000 Virgin Mary statues above someone's front door that people keep submitting.
Actually surprised that something in France was rejected, in my experience they approve anything that comes along.
OK so the text in French is wrong translated, the wall is part of the property but not inside "dans l'enceinte". Anyway i'll try again 🤷🏼♂️
Thanks for your comments 👍
We just explained that an object on school grounds is not acceptable. Knowingly resubmitting one (apparently in the hopes that bad reviewers will accept it anyway) is abuse.