Opinions on improving this nominatoin?
Rejection reasons: The real-world location of the nomination appears to represent a generic store or restaurant, Nomination title or description contains a URL or HTML markup, The real-world location of the nomination appears to be on private residential property or farm.
Now, the URL/HTML markup, was probably because I included a link to the Wikipedia article on this building - in the supporting info, obviously, and not in the description or in the title.
My question is, how would you propose I improve this for resubmitting? I think it's obviously deserving of a waypoint - it's historically noteworthy and architecturally unique, there's plenty of information on this building on the web (mostly in Hebrew, but here's an article on it in English here).
Problem is, if reviewers are gonna reject it for putting links in the supporting information, I can't see how I can prove the nomination's worthiness of an approval.
What do you think?