Bad and fake candidates
Blaumut-ING
Posts: 379 ✭✭✭✭
Thanks for these new event!
Will bad candidates and fake submissions considered against the wayfinders proposing then?
Any special measure for these event?
What do you have prepared to fight against the wayfarer with several accounts reviewing?
Tagged:
Comments
Hast the challenge already started? Because I got my first candidate from Poland (even though not being close to there) and man do the surrounding POI look suspicious. 😂
haha yes, thats definately fake xDD
Thanks for these new event!
😀
uh so now i get polish submissions here in germany. yay!
but wait! it isnt really in Poland!
And guess what it is
Oh high quality wayspots :D
🤦♀️
Hi folks,
Good question about the abusive/poor quality nominations. The existing anti-abuse measures both in the submission and review flow are unchanged. That being said, if you are participating in the challenge and you notice abusive nominations, please be sure to report them. Reported Wayspots won’t count towards the goal.
Additionally, to prevent reviewers from just blindly accepting nominations in order to unlock the rewards, we've added a number of pre-reviewed Wayspots to the queue to check for high quality reviews and take action against those who are regularly abusing the system.
With regard to the examples in this thread, I've passed them along to the abuse team to review.
Hello everyone! We have reviewed the report and have taken actions on the Wayspots and Wayfinders in accordance with our policies. However, due to insufficient evidence, we’re unable to take action on few Wayspots in the surrounding area. If you have additional evidence like the geotagged images or articles to share to confirm their actual locations, please resubmit with additional information and we’ll take another look.
Some candidate that I got to review.
And more
Another abusive, as far as I know it was nominated at least twice - my colleague shown me this nomination with different name.