Art on wall of private buildings or private border of houses.
Fleischnaka44-PGO
Posts: 11 ✭✭
Hello,
Something in the criteria is not clear for me : there is some "art" stuff on some building wall or sometime on the edge of house's borders. I already saw existing pokestops like this on the city center where I live.
But is that type of "art" included in the criteria of a pokéstop submission ? Like it is linked to a private building or house.
Thanks in advance for your help !
Post edited by NianticGiffard on
Comments
It can be eligable so long as it is not on the wall or fence of a private residential property or school. This includes any outside faces of security walls or fences that surround the property, regardless if the object itself can be reached from a sidewalk.
So, for example there is existing pokéstops in the city center which is linked to that type of mosaics which are directly on the wall of private residential building. With the actual criteria, it wouldn't be possible to make them eligible pokestops right ?
Is it a single private residence or is it a building that consists of flats?
if it is multiple flats it shouldn’t fall foul of the PRP rule.
Hi, it is multiple flats. PRP is single family residence only ?
Correct. Basically houses that inly have 1 family living in them are bad
The new rejection criteria no longer state "single family" PRP tho.. I'm afraid Niantic decides that multi family PRP will also subjected to rejection too :(
Niantic has already stated that the definision of private residential property did not change with Criteria 3.1. It has remained the same since its introduction to the Candidate Portal Criteria back when there was only Ingress.
Where have they said that, because it's not obvious and the new 3.1 guidleines can be read to suggest any residential propery could be considered "PRP". A link to an AMA would be handy.
There is the quote
And it is from this topic https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/9981/single-family-private-residential-property
The ironic think is that you responed to Casey in that topic, yet now deny it was said in this toipic.
I am not disagreeing at all that Casey said it, I was asking for a link to his comments. I don't keep track of everything I post or other people post. Thank you for the link, this is all I was wanting.
Guys, like I'm not a native I do not fully understand :
"not part of a public space within a complex."
"Public space within a complex" could mean the shared or common area (in our case it could be the exterior wall) of a private building with multiple flats ? Because those part of a building are also "private property".
Thanks
On Single Family Property, Stops are not eligible. Not inside, not even on the fence outside. Very bad for small villages, because their beauty and uniqueness is a result of great artwork on single resident houses/walls/garage doors. As far as I know, this is due to a law suit. House owners were disturbed by groups of people gathering around their houses and went to court. So maybe not even Niantic likes this rule, however it is the rule now.
Appartement Complex rules read differently with the new criteria. I am still not ceratin if I am reading correct because it is a change. Stops must be "publicly accessible". Therefore, art on the outside fence would be Ok, but not where residents only have access.
As far as I know, this is due to a law suit.
The rule existed long before that lawsuit. The suit only gave Niantic more reason to take a hard line on enforcing it.
I assume nothing has changed.
Reject if it looks like a single family residence's wall.
Acceptable if not single family.
"Can you clarify the definition of “private residential property?” Are multi-family residences included in this rejection reason? What about Wayspots that are within 40m of a private residence?
The considerations when looking at private residential property have not changed with the criteria refresh. Considering that multi-family residences like apartment complexes can have publicly accessible amenities (like playground equipment), these could still be eligible as long as they meet all of the acceptance criteria. Nominations that appear to be within 40m of private, single-family residential property should be very closely reviewed to make sure they are not on private residential property, and that they are accessible from locations not on private residential property."
What does it mean "within 40m of private" (a radius of 40m from a private property ?) ? Thanks in advance.
Exactly what it says. 40m from point A to point B. If they wanted radius they would of mentioned radius
Let’s look at the precise wording:
“closely reviewed to make sure ...” — Zoom in, look for property boundaries, and make sure that the location IS NOT on the prp.
“and that they are accessible from locations not on private residential property” — is there a way to walk to it without trespassing on prp?
SO. This means that yes, wayspots CAN be within 40m of prp, but we must be cautious when reviewing them.
I apologize, I think there is a misunderstanding, I did not understand what the part of the sentence "within 40m" itself means. My bad.
Sorry if this is considered thread necro, if this is an issue here (I think that the term is bogus in itself, always better to carry on an existing thread than create a new one) since i believe I am only bumping a thread
So something like this ought to be considered eligible? The owner clearly placed this piece of art on the corner of his private property to be admired and looked at. The submitter goes further to claim the photo was done with permission of the owner.
If this was in the middle of his garden, or at his gatepost, or along a lone driveway that leads exclusively to his home it would be a different matter.
RIght?
Because I personally feel if somebody goes out of the way to turn their garage door, wall or fence into a work of art, this invites people to stop and admire in any case. Again, provided the home is within a larger residential area and not secluded.
It's still on private residential property and is still ineligible, no matter where it is on the property. It doesn't matter if the home owner gives permission or intended for it to be seen by the public.
Rejection reason when reviewing for Private Residential Property still clearly states single family residences or private farmlands.