I'm so confused, whut
Kasparos347-PGO
Posts: 204 ✭✭✭
3 days ago, I nominated a soccer field but I got rejected. I agree that the foto wasn't good, but they reviewers say it's not permanent?! I don't understand because that isn't true. Can somebody give me advice for my resubmit?
Comments
Yeah take a better picture. It is permanent, so hope for better reviewers.
You had a bunch of bad reviewers. The photo isn't perfect, but it's definitely acceptable. I'd take one when there's better light and resubmit.
Yeah, thnx for the advice. I was already going to resubmit with better foto, but dont understand the reviewers
"Temporary or seasonal" when (properly) applied to a soccer field like this can mean the reviewers don't believe the goals are permanently in place. It looks to me like they are in this case, but hopefully a better photo will convince reviewers of that as well.
This is true, but the location should still be accepted. It's like a tennis court without the nets.
A soccer field without goals is just a patch of grass, though. There is nothing else there that defines it as an athletic field.
Both rejection reasons are correct or at least understandable: The picture is poor and even though you say the goal posts are permanent, I do understand that why someone might think they aren't. In addition, it isn't a 'proper' football pitch, looks more like some lawn between some terrace houses. The reviewers were right and the main point was mentioned in the first place.
Anyway, the main thing is to take a better photo. My dutch isn't the best, but I wouldn't mention children in your description. Sometimes it can appear a bit creepy or in other cases like you're sucking up to someone. Just describing it as a neighborhood football pitch should be fine
Thanks to you all for the advice and I will make a better picture and description while making new resubmit :)