Should This Have Been Rejected?
BBfromTN-PGO
Posts: 18 ✭✭
I recently used an upgrade on a sign for a local park and as you can see it was rejected. The reason for the rejection given in the email was that "it did not meet the criteria".
When reviewing I *5 almost all signs for parks. Any thoughts on this? Should I try submitting it again or is it not eligible? Thanks for any thoughts on this.
Answers
Its a generic sign which is more like a traimarker, but not for a trail. As an entrance sign it might be okay, but this is very poor.
It's a sign pointing to the entrance of the park, not the real entrance of the park.
There is already a Wayspot to the entry sign of the park. The sign you are submitting isn't an entry sign, but a directional sign and does not mark the entrance to the park.
I would have rejected this as a traffic sign.
@TheFarix-PGO Is correct I saw this reviewing and duped it. I don't think that just because it is a metal sign it should be rejected, but the park already had a waypoint with a better sign anyway. You can only have one waypoint that represents the park. @BBfromTN-PGO