Fools in Wayfarer community
ExTaza161-PGO
Posts: 4 ✭✭
"Your PokéStop Nomination Is Ineligible
This nomination has been rejected due to the following reason(s):
Nomination does not appear to be permanent or appears to be a seasonal display that is only put up during certain times of the year."
Change your assessment policy.
Tell me, how my nomination does not appear to be permanent?
This is clinker art on the library wall.
I am disgusted. Wayfarer community are disgusting...
Only fools could reject it with such a reason.
Once again... CHANGE YOUR ASSESSMENT POLICY!!!
Comments
Kolego w naszym kraju tylko 10 % oceniających robi to tak jak trzeba reszta jak dla mnie to oszołomy zasługujące na bana.
Ja tą nominację zrobiłem poraz 21 i pewnie też nie przejdzie .
Dlatego trzeba pisać takie posty, by pokazywać patologię społeczności.
Jakby dodali tygodniowe zadania w pokemon go, w których m.in by było "zrecenzuj poprawnie nominację", to by raz dwa wszystko by ruszyło z kopyta i nie byłoby problemów z takimi nominacjami jak nasze.
Ogólnie to na niemieckim forum da się wyczytać namawianie do obalania każdej nominacji z Polski. Nasze nominacje nie tylko Polacy oceniają, ale też niemcy właśnie - umyślnie z małej.
It’s submittable. Just submit it again
It should have passed as a mural
It's not a solution.The current grading system is not working. We need a change.
The current grading system works well for the majority of cases, if it didn't it would have been cancelled when it was OPR and would never have been rolled out to Pogo players when it became Wayfarer.
Undoubtedly there will be a % that are incorrectly rejected but that is going to be the minority not the majority.
To say that because your submissions are rejected the entire system needs to be changed is ridiculous
@ExTaza161-PGO i marked your comment as insightful because I agree & it takes little things like that to help others notice as well. Don’t get discouraged or give up. It’s frustrating at times I know & understand but I promise it will get better & get easier
Instead of telling us how disgusted you are and how disgusting we are, how about telling us exactly how you would fix it (apart from making it so that all your submissions go through automatically)?
Maybe an improved reviewing workflow.
Start with rejection criteria. Get 1* star in any of them and the reviewing process ends.
1) Rate the photo. 1* would open a menu to give the reasons: Abuse, Subject clearly can't be a wayspot (person, animal, tree, someone's TV), or Bad quality photo (too dark, rotated, faces and license plates, etc.). Things like third party photos or manipulated images (please include!) can go in abuse or separately.
2) Rate the Title / Description. 1*: Abuse again, Doesn't mach the photo, URLs or Usernames, etc.
3) Check for duplicates, same as current
4) Show additional image and description, along with the map. Check location and accessibility. 1*: Mismatched location, PRP, no pedestrian access. Make the wording clear with mismatched location: it is to be used only when you can clearly determine from the evidence that the PoI is not there. Add a separate reason: unable to determine location.
Now move to the elegibility criteria. Rate 1* to 5* each one. Give examples of what is expected to be 5* stars in each criteria. Some PoIs may meet more than one of them!
1) Great place to explore
2) Great place to be social
3) Great place to exercise
And that's it. If a PoI isn't rejected outright and gets enough stars, it'll be approved. How many stars? Secret sauce! Maybe either a five in any of the three elegibilities or a total of 8 or more stars between them. Maybe photo, title and location ratings help as well.
I think something along this lines will help streamline and improve reviews.
Cheers,
👆
Can we see the supporting photo of this nomination as well with info
Lechu1730, this is really helpful. I’d like to see improvements along these lines made. Thanks.