What would you do with these?
907PhilNKids-PGO
Posts: 12 ✭✭
I get a lot of these for review. It is a trail marker on a trail used for dogsledding, biking and skiing. So, a great place for exercise... but it is just another of many mass produced generic signs. I am inclined to reject all of these. Is that what you would do?
Comments
How many signs exactly like this would you say there are in existence? I would approve it. If I started to see so many signs like this pop up depending on density id vote accordingly for visually uniqueness
looks like a mass produced sign for me, 1*.
Also, this sign got no educational aspects and is just a warning sign. Also, based on the sign holder, the sign looks unpermanent, maybe only existent while the ski season.
If it marks the beginning/endpoint of a trail or an access point onto the trial, I would give it a pass. But if it is a sign along the trail, but doesn't represent an access point, then I would reject it. The important part is the trail or access point and the sign is simply a physical object that represents the actual nomination. The sign itself is inconsequential.
The top half is mass produced, but the bottom is a named trail so I'd approve overall based on that.
If the Jeff Studdert Sleddog Trail is nominated, I accept that nomination.
Those trail markers were always eligible. With the updated criteria even more.