Valid proposal rejected
Fulltoralkemist-PGO
Posts: 3 ✭✭
Valid proposal according to your criteria, it has already been rejected more than 6 times, I ask you please to review personally and assess if it is suitable, due to the lack of judgment of the voters
As can be seen in streetview, the proposal does not belong to businesses or private residences, it does not obstruct any service, it is easily accessible, and it is a beautiful place to visit. however, it has already been rejected more than 6 times due to lack of information from voters. I ask that niantic do something about it, that they review my proposal and assess themselves if the proposal is valid.
https://goo.gl/maps/ywgFoJ1Dc9Czfwgs7
Comments
And what would you think why it's eligible?
It could be considered an art installation. Falls under the "explore" eligibility criteria.
I don't think it's ineligible, but it's not really a slamdunk nomination either. I'd probably let it through, though. Nominations like this are hard to pass, so if you're really committed to it, you should retry it.
It's not what I would call a "cool work of art." And yes, as a reviewer, it is perflectly within my right to judge whether something is eligible as art. Just because something is decorative doesn't mean it is art.
I think it's elegible as an art installation but it isn't particularly notable, so as it is I'd rate it 2*. You may try to keep submitting it and it may eventually pass but I don't give it good chances of that.
You mention "the proposal does not belong to businesses or private residences"
so... Who do they belong to?
This looks like belongs to the car shop on the left side... however, this does not invalidate the nomination.
I would give it a 3* probably... it is docorative, somewhat artistic, but imho not a "cool work of art".