“categories like ‘generic businesses’ “Wayfarer Release Notes 3.1
Title of the Wayspot: Pizza Hut Telford Forge Retail Park
Location: 52.679576 -2.453307
City: Telford
Country: England
Screenshot of the Rejection Email:
Photos to support your claim:
Additional information:
This nomination has been rejected due to the following reason(s):
While I don’t really care about the rejection, I submitted it to see if the Wayfarer Community would accept it bearing in mind the dialogue in the Release Notes for Wayfarer 3.1, in the quoted in subject.
what annoys me is the shear laziness of some in the Niantic Wayfarer community. How can a generic “Pizza Hut” business be described as having “gravestones or cemeteries when it is in a Retail Park? How can it be described as a location that has “explicit or inappropriate activity”?
this is not the first time I’ve seen these types of descriptions as reasons for rejection.
To me this means the whole waypoint review process is massively broken, massively broken.
Yours sincerely,
Fed up of Telford, England




Comments
Judging by your description, there was shear laziness from your side too. How do you expect better from reviewers?
As many of us have said before... don't focus on the reasons alone. This should have been rejected, so the outcome is correct.
Keep in mind you get to see all rejection reasons; so if only one person ticked that box, you will see it.
So 99% of those who got to review it may have used the right reason, so the system is not necessarily broken.
edit: This is not the place to complain about regular rejections.
Sheer lazyness is also to neglect any research about what might be the correct forum for this complaint. It's certainly not "Invalid Wayspot Appeals".
Invalid Appeal - Thanks for the appeal, Trainer. We're not currently reviewing PokéStop submissions. Please resubmit the nomination by improving its title/description if you feel that it was a valid nomination.