St. Cloud Abuse Update 4: The concerted effort continues
St. Cloud, FL is at it again. Just like always, the people of St. Cloud are continuing to submit fake wayspots, colluding together to move wayspots during review and approve low-quality wayspots, resubmitting wayspots removed by Niantic, all while finding fun new ways to **** me. As usual, a full list of abusive wayspots will be at the end of the post. Something that is also worth mentioning this time around is that the satellite view of the area has finally been updated.
Resubmission of nominations removed by Niantic
There is a new trend that has started of users from the St. Cloud area attempting to appeal and replace wayspots that were removed by Niantic as a result of them not having safe pedestrian access, among possibly other reasons. This has happened on this forum at least four times by at least three different people in the past month or so. Those posts can be found here, here, here, and here.
The first post discusses Mosaic Tile Heron, however, after the now-banned OP ignored the advice of everyone telling them that it clearly didn’t meet Niantic’s requirements for pedestrian access, the person went ahead and just resubmitted the nomination with an alt account (technically that person’s “main” account), complete with a misleading supplemental that encourages users to accept a nomination that blatantly does not meet the pedestrian access requirement. After just a few days this nomination went on to get approved:
Unfortunately for the person responsible for this, the new portal was removed within a day thanks to an in-app report for, you guessed it, pedestrian access. (We will talk about how that happened later). The portal getting removed a second time didn’t stop them though, as they went on to submit the portal a third time, and as of now the third iteration is still in-game.
The problem is, this isn’t an isolated incident. In the second post I linked above which discusses Isles Fountain, after having the appeal denied (although for an admittedly weird reason), the OP admitted their intention to do the exact same thing and resubmit the removed wayspot. And they meant it! That nomination was once again submitted and it is now back in game as well.
That user went on to do the same thing with Hammock Pointe Flag Post, which was removed, appealed, and then just resubmitted. That portal now exists as Dedication Flagpole Hammock Pointe.
While not necessarily abuse, the OP in the fourth thread which discussed Lake Nona Golf and Country Club did eventually come to terms with the pedestrian access issue, however, they then went on to discuss their intention to nominate neighborhood signs on corners of intersections instead of ones in the median. Given the track record of St. Cloud approving basically any of their own nominations, including neighborhood signs, this has potential for abuse.
The above instances are not the only cases of them resubmitting wayspots that Niantic removed. Although no one attempted to appeal it before resubmitting, another wayspot that appears to have been removed for pedestrian access and then resubmitted is Turtle Creek Tower, which I believe replaced “Turtle Creek Entrance Tower” at the same location.
It is very clear that the users in this area do not understand the guidelines to submit proper nominations, and that they have no respect for learning and following those guidelines. On the forum they have frequently argued that “the community reviewed them and they were accepted,” but they don’t seem to have any regard for actually following the rules that Niantic sets. This also harkens back to the generic business signs, neighborhood signs, and other extremely low quality submissions that were recently approved in the area that I discussed in Update 3, many of which continue to exist.
Continued Targeted Harassment and Ingress Multiaccounting
In Update 3 I went into detail about the “for all to enjoy” callsign that has been used among the abuse group. Well, it turns out that these people have found a way to take that and target me even more. Shortly after my last update, these people went digging for my friend code, managed to find it, and sent me a friend request on my Pokemon Go account from an account named “4All2NJoy”. Luckily it was pretty easy to figure out who was responsible and where they acquired my friend code from.
Of course it will come to absolutely no surprise that there is now also a matching Ingress account running around the St. Cloud area with the same name (“4All2NJoy”) and of course the account was deployed into a number of the newly identified fake/abusive portals. The account was also kind enough to deploy into the replacement Mosaic Tile Heron portal right after it was created, making it very easy to report in-app. This is no doubt a new account being leveled up to be able to continue nominating more abusive wayspots with. This account needs to be banned, along with the main account of the person responsible (the same person who submitted Mosaic Tile Heron and other wayspots on this list).
Niantic’s refusal to rectify portal stacking is incentivizing this abuse.
After posting my Update 3 thread, I received this message on Facebook. This is the same person who submitted Mosaic Tile Heron, by the way.
It has proven to be trivial for these people to create new pokestops by moving them wherever they want during review, as after 4 different reports they haven’t stopped. Because these people have no problems moving things during review, they are creating lots of things that should have been rejected for proximity if they were approved in their correct location, or at minimum they are creating Pokestops that only should have been a portal due to S2 Cell rules. When Niantic moves these wayspots back to their “correct” locations the POIs don’t reroll, unlike with what happens when a regular location edit is resolved. This means that Niantic is rewarding these people with extra stacked pokestops when resolving this abuse. And judging by the message above, it is clearly motivating them to continue abusing. The pokestop stacks across the city need to be rerolled. I shared this image before but this is just one example:
This stack can be seen here at Veterans Park, but it is only one of many. To reiterate how insane the abuse is, one of the cells has EIGHT Pokestops in one L17 S2 Cell, and the neighboring cell has another three. There are multiple other large stacks such as Lakefront Park and Downtown St. Cloud, and an innumerable number of small stacks across the city. Niantic needs to outright delete these Pokestops, when actioning them for abuse, or they need to get rerolled when they are moved from one location to another.
Using the Abuse Form to further their abuse?
Possibly the most puzzling case of abuse is the story of Rotary Club Bench. I had Rotary Club Bench on my list in Update 3. Instead of being submitted in the correct place, and moved during review, Rotary Club Bench was submitted in the wrong place, a couple blocks away from where it should have been, and was then accepted in that same incorrect place. I reviewed this nomination, and the supplemental photo clearly showed it that it is at approximately 28.255010,-81.293699 across the street from 400 Dakota Ave, St Cloud, FL 34769, which can be seen in the supplemental photo.
A user known to be involved with the abuse actually reached out to me and claimed that this one was submitted in the incorrect place by accident and asked me how they could fix it and get it moved to the correct location, and I told them to use the abuse form to submit a move request. Well, I’m guessing that they did eventually do that, because the wayspot did get moved… to an entirely different bench even further away from the actual location. No idea how exactly this happened, but it is definitely not in the correct place currently. It belongs at 28.255010,-81.293699.
Abusive wayspots repeatedly landing in the same locations:
Now that we are 5 reports in, more and more patterns are becoming visible. One of these patterns is that some of the locations where the abusive wayspots keep landing are repeatedly the same. For example, Conservation Area Sign is at least the second or third fake wayspot to end up at the end of this culdesac, with other fake wayspots having been previously removed from this small neighborhood. Similar examples at other locations include Legacy Playground, Oak Ridge Pavilion, and more. These locations are clearly being targeted for the convenience of players. The players involved with and regularly utilizing these locations need to be thoroughly investigated.
The biggest current offender of this trend are the numerous fake/misplaced wayspots at Orlando VA Medical Center at Lake Nona and the surrounding area, including Eagle Statue, World War II MEMORIAL, College of Medicine Clocktower, Lake Nona Information Board, and Metal Daffodils, with even more abuse across the street. This location continues to be a hotspot for illegitimate wayspots, and probably has had the most collective abuse than any other location in the St. Cloud area. It is likely that other wayspots within the hospital that are more longstanding are also abusively misplaced as well, but it is essentially impossible to investigate due to the nature of the hospital and pandemic. I was lucky to be able to catch the reflection on Lake Nona Information Board to tell that it is located near Bosphorous, a restaurant deep within a plaza across the street.
Conclusion:
Here is the full list of abuse wayspots that I have currently identified:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SsjSoLOAFj_cyRduq_z2laPCiE68Wxr7pEVRkMiN2tg/edit?usp=sharing
I am honestly concerned at what point Niantic will take these people seriously. I first reported this in January, and evidence shows the group was abusing the system long before then. This is a concerted effort by a group of people that isn't going to stop without very severe action from Niantic. Given that almost 6 months and 5 reports later these people are still up to the same things, I can’t see any logic that anything other than permanent bans should be in order at this point.
Comments
Once again an incredible job by Andi tracking down and tying together all the strings of abuse at play here.
Hopefully by this point the patterns are clear enough and the repetition of abuse blatant enough that Niantic can take more severe and decisive action against those involved.
Once again the conservation sign is 100% legit if you were there in person you would know that. Most of your list is in the correct spot. I wish I had the time on my hands Andi does lol
The sign is right by the sidewalk under a tree so how would that be seen by satellite Andi?
Admirable job as always.
I continue to be amazed by how similar, if not identical, the ways abusers operate are, even from different ends of the globe. Sometimes I wonder if they've got some kind of global Discord server where they collude together.
I also definitely agree with you on the feeling that Niantic aren't taking these people seriously. The ineffective action against abusers, the creation of clusters following reports (thus acctively HELPING the abusers), the continued promises to be better and provide reporters with better tools that all amount to nothing... I envy your persistent determination despite it all.
The generic sign which does not meet any of the eligibility criteria and was likely only accepted because the entire town of St. Cloud colludes to get as much accepted as possible is at least the third fake and/or ineligble wayspot to appear at that location. There are obvious doubts to the legitimacy of anything at that location after multiple fake wayspots have already been approved and removed from the same spot, much less the questionable eligibility of this nomination. I have no doubts that Niantic will find a pattern with whoever submitted the wayspot and the other current and former falsified wayspots that are scattered around town. Just like they would find a pattern if they were to look at the rest of the wayspots that you have claimed are real and compared them to how many of those were fake.
Edit: Forgot to mention it wouldn't be the first fake "conservation sign" that has been removed from St. Cloud either.
Great job Andis.
Quick question for any Nia staff looking at this, we know (whether you want to admit to it or not) you are capable of black holing submissions, you (or your previous staff who no longer work there?) are able to layer an abuse vector to specific area's, here's an idea, add the abuse vector St Cloud, then nothing will get seen without upgrading, that might deter them a little bit.
I'm guessing St Cloud is a "priority cell", that's how these players are able to re-add things so quickly, otherwise a normal non-priority would take months to go through without an upgrade, and as upgrades work, they'd be distributed to a wider player/reviewer base.
@NianticGiffard I know you can't give me a real answer, but can you take this abuse vector thought to whoever pulls the strings over there?
It is definitely a priority cell, reviews turnarounds there only take between a couple days and a couple weeks. And that is actually one of the problems with this type of abuse. Submitters are realistically limited by the number of eligible things in their area of play. But when you are in the business of just making up fake wayspots, you don't really have a limit anymore. The review prioritization also makes abuse easier because when you log in and your area is the first thing you review, it makes it quick and easy for an entire town to do. I commonly get St. Cloud nominations as one of my first reviews of the day. Its a major design flaw and one of the reasons that the heavy prioritization of rural areas needs to end. Just north of St. Cloud is Orlando, and between the two is a cell line for review time prioritization. Once you get into Orlando, you just don't get approvals unless you earn an upgrade. Approvals completely stopped for most of Orlando and some other areas back in November when they rolled out photo reviews and let level 38 PoGo players submit.
There are people who actually put efford into Wayfarer and not just abuse the system by using priority areas.
How is this classified as a Rural area anyway? Maps show a decidedly suburban feel. The rural towns I submit are usually one-waypoint towns until I travel there and find valid candidates, but once one or two are accepted the turnaround time increases to the point where I have to wait weeks or months if I don't upgrade.
Should a bunch of us set our bonus locations to St. Cloud to help break up this coordination ring?
St. Cloud is basically at the northwest corner of their review cell. The cell is primarily swamp, farmland, and lakes. It gives them a nice boost despite St. Cloud and Kissimmee being decently suburban.
I always wondered how some areas were able to find their stuff to abuse so quick.
I thought it wasn't possible to build that kind of cluster anymore. Not that it matters, but it must be an old one, isn't it?
As far as I know the spot disappears now when moved to an occupied cell. I think Niantic should actually enforce one stop per cell (even for old ones), making these ridiculous clusters disappear altogether.
The cluster there is only a few months old. It exists because Niantic manually moved the Wayspots there. They didn't seem to follow the same procedure that an edit submitted in-game and processed through Wayfarer would.
Great job Andis, hopefully this one is the final one
People are honestly ridiculous. It’s hard to believe someone would go through that much trouble. I know I personally wouldn’t ever but that’s just me. There’s too much to enjoy by going out & actually submitting real stuff I guess. I have a lot of fun just searching for those things to submit in communities & get a lot of satisfaction out of just finding those things & submitting them personally. I wish people would stop faking stuff. Good job @AisforAndis-ING. The community has your back
Sorry, I didn't read the whole thing thoroughly the first time. Unbelievable.
I appreciate your effort in spotting abuses and flagging the report to us, @AisforAndis-ING! I have shared it with the team for their scrutiny and to take appropriate actions wherever required. I'll share the outcome here as soon we arrive at a conclusion.
Always entertaining reading Andy's posts, but at the same time it's quite concerning that this is already the 4th thread about the same thing. Andy has done all the homework for you on all of his posts, and yet....we see a repeat constantly. Wouldn't it just be easier at this time to admit that you honestly don't care about the effort put in by the community and just remove reports altogether?
You had another conservation sign removed in Kissimmee it was legit as well lol
YOU had it removed
The one who’s to blame is the one submitting fakes. If fakes weren’t being submitted the ones that were real wouldn’t be targeted. Simple as that. People will realize it’s not as fun as it looks once they have to go back & submit the same stuff all over again. It happens. Real POI get removed because someone being ignorant submitting fakes. @Tagtheone-PGO if anyone wants to get mad at someone. Find out who that person is submitting fakes & confront them not to do it anymore & this wouldn’t happen. Problem solved. That’s why it is HIGHLY recommended not to fake stuff. Don’t blame @AisforAndis-ING. He didn’t have it removed. He just done the right thing & followed by the rules. It’s not helping him any by having to waste his time to have it removed
The Zodiac I know what I said, and it was said for a reason, no need to try and correct me.
Oh no, I’m not trying to correct you. I quoted you because I agreed. You misunderstood what was said. My only intention was to make those who are truly guilty feel ignorant for what they’ve done. I wish I knew who they were. They need someone to let them know that they are wasting everyone’s time
Unfortunately St.Cloud isnt the only case, where Niantic fails hard. For their defense: St.Cloud may be a bit complicated example since lots of people and accounts seem to be involved, but even in easy cases Niantic fails hard:
Here the town of Schwarzenberg:
(two initial mass removal threads with 160 reports, and the others are smaller follow ups)
Situation is here more easy than in St.Cloud: there seem to be only a few players, that submit stuff from this town (or neighbour towns) multiple times at different fake locations. No strange edits, and no third party tools for gallery access. They simply tried to fill evry empty PoGo-cell with fakes and duplicates. The region has simply a very high priority and reviewing times less than 2 weeks ..... so I guess they "succeeded" by trying their fakes again and again, until they found the set of foolish reviewers to accept them.
In the end these threads removed/corrected 200 wayspots. There are a lot of fakes left .... for example there are lots of facade stucco portals, that I can't disprove without visitting the town (no streetview at most places).
These are few locations, that appeared repeatedly. In the end the amount of follow-up-threads here is too damn high. For example the spot in the east is mentioned 4 times .....
But at the moment it's quiet there. So maybe it was enough now....
So you say this may be nethertheless a complex case? Maybe this is easy enough for Niantic:
Bärenloh - a dead end street with a bunch of single family homes in the middle of forrest. And one of the Single family homes is obviously the home of a faker. Around one house I reported each time multiple fakes now for the 5th time:
One of the fakes appeared now the 4th time with the exact same picture, object is from a neighbor town. So whatever happened here ..... I guess we can't find a more flagrant single fake location, and looking at this location, one can say again, that the number of follow-up-threads is too damn high ....
Nice to mention in this example: in part 3 a Nia trainee (at least I hope, that it wasnt Giffard himself) wasn't able to deal with coordinates using minute and second of an arc instead of coordinates with decimal places. That's a format, that even google uses as output (but not input). That's a very poor performance for a company, whose boss claims, that his dream is to map the world ...... his employees already fail at common coordinate systems. Great. Not.
But you can just complain about legit stuff it will be removed niantic doesn’t really do the research they just remove if you keep complaining. Not crying here. Not saying anything here that is not true. That’s just the facts I think if you want to complain on the in app that’s fine but if you are not able to actually see what you are assuming is incorrect. That just makes you incorrect and guessing it’s wrong or right
Nothing of the reported stuff was legit. The objects are only somewhere in the town or at neighbor towns.... and often not only once submitted in fake locations....
So that has nothing to do with complaints. That are reports. The complaints from above are restricted to how the fakers seem to be not punished, although there are enough obvious hints, that even multiaccounting can't veil what's going on there.
There are further unimportant complaints, that I didnt mention. So for example that the staff member decided to move 5/6 similar wayspots of a set to their correct locations, but deleted the 6th one. Or they decided to not delete a wayspot in the middle of the only driveway of a main fire department... this is stuff I don't understand, and but nethertheless totally unimportant here. The point here is, that people like you, should be banned on all accounts asap.
\edit: all the reviewers, who accepted such obvious fakes, that I can easily disprove without having the support photo and even without Streetview, should also get schooled by Niantic ...
Once again, the generic conservation sign does not meet any acceptance criteria. It is not a great place to exercise, socialize, or explore. In fact, it is an area that you are supposed to stay out of. This is another example of a group of people colluding together to get as many things accepted as possible, regardless of eligiblity. And even if the sign was there, why would there have been multiple fake nominations submitted at that location if there truly was an eligible object there instead? It doesn't add up.
But @Tagtheone-PGO, while you are here, perhaps you could clear something else up for us? In my post above, I'm sure you saw me talk about Rotary Club Bench and how someone reached out to me to try to get that location "fixed" and yet it just happened to end up being moved even further from its correct location. I'm sure I don't need to remind you, but that person who submitted that request was you, and the messages below will easily show that, including the confirmation message you kindly shared after you submitted that location request. Would you care to explain how that POI just happened to move blocks away from where it should have been moved? I find it very interesting that you are so bent up on a conservation sign when you were previously very concerned about the accuracy of this bench but after you submitted a request on it, it is now even more wrong than before.
Easy tiger, this one might be on Niantic (Nothing new there, them screwing up at this stage is just like a fish swimming: It's EXPECTED).
There are already topics where people have asked Niantic to move a portal to it's correct location and they end up moving another random portal, or they just move the portal into the wrong coordinates. How they do this is beyond me as it's as simple as editing an object, pasting the coordinates given, and then saving the changes. But their spaghetti code might have just entangled this movement.
Could also be that this dude purposedly submitted wrong coordinates, but don't count out Niantic pulling a Niantic.
Looks around the room, sees dozens of abuse reports.
Comes to the conclusion that this one incident in the sea of abuse is Niantic's doing.