It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In with Ingress Sign In with Pokémon GO
There are no law nor moral rules that are being broken by someone posting a photo of the submitters face here. Think about it like this… he posted his face for the world to see when he submitted the nomination. Any lawyer will tell you that no laws have been broken & there is no case here. He knew the rules & did not follow them & if he didn’t, he should have read them.
No, trainers cannot have a pokestop when they walk around....
"If this actually made it will be funny" Nah, ****, it wouldn't be funny.
The above POI proposals may have been made by third parties impersonating the parties concerned.
It actually would be 😂
If that made it through, Niantic "wouldn't" be able to remove it because it "doesn't meet any removal criteria".
Imagine a world where "not meeting any acceptance criteria" isn't a valid removal criteria. Welcome to WF.
Fire hydrant lids
Title: "Stylish fire hydrant
Just a bridge.
This is a terrible.
It's so bad I'm speechless.
Title: "The Young Monument
Description: Built for the peace of the neighbourhood.
Additional information: Because it is a magnificent stone monument.
No, no, no.
It is easy to read from the inscription that this is a stone monument erected in the grounds of the home by the family of Mr Furuhashi, a corporal in the Japanese Army, who was greatly saddened and regretted his **** in the war.
All of these are private residence. The library & food donation one is a fake. The photo was taken elsewhere & brought to this location where it was submitted. It is at a residence rather than an organization
I had this one too a couple of days ago 😂
This is the pavilion in the forest where Monet, the main character in the NHK morning TV series "Welcome Back Monet," took shelter from the rain.
However, this building is not a pavilion but a hut, with a large sign attached to the wall in front that reads "No Trespassing
The applicant seems to be trying to hide the prohibition of entry, which should not be overlooked, by photographing the building from an angle instead of from the front.
According to the supplementary photos, the entrance to the library is located next to an existing spot.
Originally, the pin should be placed at the entrance of the facility, but in order to increase the number of spots, we dared to place it farther away.
An application is being submitted to a location that appears to be your home with an image that makes no sense.
A board placed on the site of an old building.
Nah, for me, that would be annoying af.
Already seen some suspect stuff slip through the cracks in my surrounding area and that annoys me since it can't be removed for not meeting removal criteria!
Do you close your eyes on abuse cases?
I'm getting the feeling that you don't understand my posts. You've stated that i support spoofers, and now you're questioning my judgement on abuse cases.
As if it wasn't blatantly obviously, i don't support abusive submissions. My jab was aimed at Niantic, that deems itself powerless (Imagine the CREATOR of an IP being POWERLESS) to remove things that don't meet removal criteria. If something doesn't meet ANY acceptance criteria (Trash cans, pepsi bottles, etc), that's REASON ENOUGH for removal. Yet, the CREATOR of this IP apparently can't do anything, despite running the servers and having the source code and entire backbone of the project.
I'll start making my stances quite clear so that you won't misunderstand me again.
"It can be removed, but Niantic won't actually do it because they don't want to/don't care." FTFY.
You act like they dont remove trash like that, how does that make them powerless?
Wrong. If something doesn't meet any removal criteria, it does not get removed. That's why it's called removal criteria. Do you think people would be so upset about junk passing the review stages if it could very easily be removed?
Wrong, i'm very well experienced in removing invalid objects as well as abuse ranging from 1 instance to mass abuse in different countries. I know first had what Niantic decides to remove and what they don't.
Not to question your authority, dear sir, but could you please provide examples of what you stated?
Never did i claim inside knowledge, its all open source in these forums, do some research before you make more blatant lies to fit your narrative.
Now, without avoiding the question at hand, could you provide examples of such removals?
Perhaps this was taken from home.
To be honest, it's getting in the way, so please take your discussions that require a lot of replies elsewhere.
It is a shrine, an object of worship for the inhabitants of the house alone, set up in a corner of the grounds of a private residence.
It is for the exclusive use of the people of that house.
a false application.
Wall next to the gate post of a private house.
Definitely the most ridiculous one I’ve seen in a while