Default Avatar

Baltaar81-PGO

✭✭

Baltaar81-PGO ✭✭

Badges

Name DropperFirst Comment

Comments

  • Thanks, that is good to know, will nominate it again at some point if that is the case. Will try and get a wider view of the building as the main photo and a bit of a side view to help clarify its status as flats/apartments as well as show it from a different angle (and revise the text obviously). If it is rejected again,…
  • The building is now Flats, though it is gated, not sure if that matters? Re-reading the additional information now, I can see how it seems a bit vague on current use, as said in a reply to someone else I was trying to keep the historical info while fitting it in the space provided.
  • Ah ok, it is flats (if it was a house I would not have attempted it to be fair) but it's gated and therefore access to the grounds is rescricted, so I'm thinking it may not be worth another attempt. I was too focused on giving the building history that I ran out of space in the additional info text and went with what would…
  • No residential at all, will definitely not make that mistake again. Confused as to how I've seen plaques etc on residential building get stops in the past but I'd definatly apply that to both nominations and reviews from now on.
  • Noted, I had noticed this when reviewing nominations myself. I was trying to show that there was plenty of pedestrian access but should have included the suggested building in the photo. Will do this for future nominations (not if this one ofcourse).
  • Ah I see it was originally called The Open Hearth until a few years ago, there are a fair few articles in local newspapers (including the websites) about its eventual closure but only when you google the old name. I used the current name to be accurate but (other issues with the nomination aside) I should have probably…
  • I definitely put the pin marker as close to the buidling as I could (it does not appear on the POGO in-world map so was tough to judge), that certainly makes it a little clearer. It's the fact that the building has an area of private land between the street and itself. If it was actually directly on the street then it may…
  • Seems its was a bit of both then, if it was just the photo then I'd probably try again, although the historical context of building was the point of its nomination so I'm not sure I can make it look that much more interesting. The residential issue makes sense (not wanting groups of people hanging around outside etc) but…