Default Avatar

Frewfrux-PGO

✭✭

Frewfrux-PGO ✭✭

Badges

5 Likes10 CommentsName DropperFirst Comment

Comments

  • Oh, all I was thinking of in terms of the menu was the restaurant's logo, but yeah, I'll skip that idea. Thanks for the warning!
  • Okay, I might stop by and ask the manager or owner if they mind if I take a picture of their menu cover. That might actually work better. Any suggestions as to what this "other" rejection criteria might have been?
  • The rating system is subjective. In my personal opinion, poor grammer/spelling that is "facing the public" is a poor reflection on the developers of the software. A single error in the text is likely an honest mistake. Two or three errors means the submitting player probably didn't review the submission before hand and…
  • I'm thinking of maybe using this photo, but I dont know if it will work. Will the way point just crop out the center of the photo?
  • Yeah, I'm not going to bother with this one again, I don't think. There's nothing here that's unique. Besides, someone already got the North part of the park approved using a generic sign, so I'll just be happy for them and leave it for now. Thanks all.
  • So, on the one hand we need to get up close and personal with our subject zoomed in and centered as much as possible, unless it's a generic park in which case we need to zoom out to take as much of it in as we can. I think you're right, it would be easily rejected. Especially by people who just reject based on a photo…
  • Yeah, I suppose you're right. I guess that means that generic parks and trails that don't have unique signage of some sort are not eligible then. Why do I live in such a boring part of the city?
  • So then art, and spaces designed to be used by the public, are valid submissions even if they are on strata (multi-family) property, right?
  • What about an LFL on private residential property where the private property was a multi-family unit or complex?
  • Oh? Ah, okay. That makes me feet a little better. Hopefully that number will go up. And thank you for pointing that out :)
  • That's unfortunate. That means what I think should or shouldn't be a way point is only lining up with what the rest of the community thinks 24 out of 66 times = 36% of the time. :( No wonder all my nominations are getting rejected - I don't know what is acceptable or not acceptable to the community, despite reading up on…
  • SWEET!!! Thanks for that link. Page bookmarked. :)
  • Interesting. In the Strata Act (at least for BC Canada) strata property ("common" areas that are a part of the condo or townhouse complex) are all private property. The "common" aspect of them is in reference to them being for common use of the owners, and not the public. This applies to playgrounds as well. I think that…
  • Where did that grid come from? I haven't seen that yet. And yeah, I'm writing up another stop for the balancing logs in the playground as they are a separate area away from the playground equipment. Before I submit it, however, I think I'll post it here to get a feel for whether I'm doing it right or not.
  • Oh, yes, sorry. Both signs do say Blumsen Park. In fact, both signs are exactly the same. As they are exactly the same, neither is unique. So, does that mean non-unique signs count, even if they are close to each other, or is the distance that those two sign are apart from each other enough to make them "distinct?"
  • I'm glad you mentioned Blumsen Park as that park covers a smaller area, not separated by any roads, and counts as two stops, one for the park (with a unique sign) and one for the north entrance (using a generic sign). It was that example, along with other comments in this forum to do with distance) that made me believe…
  • There are no unique signs for this park. How large does the park need to be in order for it's entrances to qualify as additional stops? This park covers about 1.5 miles square in area, and is broken up into 4 distinct sections each separated by various roads. None of the entrances have any unique signage at all, only…
  • Thanks! I wasn't sure if re-submitting them would be considered spamming or something, so I wanted to check before I did that. Also, I haven't heard of this nomination improvement section....I assume that's a section in this Forum? I'll make sure to check it out. Thanks again!!!