LukeAllStars-ING
Ambassador
LukeAllStars-ING Ambassador
Reactions
Comments
-
Exakt was @Maxyme99-PGO sagt. Es gibt Objekte, die so schon gut als Waystops geeignet sind. Aber bei Parks und Plätzen benötigt es immer ein Schild. Sonst könnte man jede beliebige Grünfläche als Park und jede Fläche als Platz einreichen. Das soll durch die Schilederregel verhindert werden.
-
In this case, its more likely to get the cell rules restored. The cells sometimes got more than 5 PokeStops. I dont care about a meter, I care about the edit abuse. And like this, the abuse can get cleared.
-
Du brauchst ein Schild mit Namen oder einen anderen Anker, welcher den Wayspot repräsentiert. Einfach nur grün ist nicht zulässig. "Erfüllt die Akzeptanzkriterien nicht" ist der richtige Ablehngrund bei diesem Vorschlag
-
Honestly, I would not speculate about this. He might come back soon. I mean Casey last message was way longer in the past. If Giffard leaves, who would be the Wayfarer community administrator? In the latest roadmap Update there was the "the Team is growing" point. Maybe they are busy explaining the job to new team members.
-
Its on the object, so its correct. The tower is covering an area which doesnt get represented by the current location.
-
Looks good. But dont expect an instant approval. I tried a perfect Restaurant twice and it got rejected for random reasons both times.
-
You cant appeal rejected Portal nominations (yet). You have to resubmit. Also, this looks a bit like PRP, but I havent really checked that.
-
Pack den Gokus auf den Stein und nicht auf den Busch. Sonst wird der sicher nochmal abgelehnt. Außerdem sind Grünanöagen nicht zwingend zulässig, man braucht nen Schild oder wie hier nen Stein mit dem Namen.
-
Pretty simple: only popular/important transit stations are eligible. Bus stations are not that important and so they are ineligible.
-
2 is in the lake xD 3 is whether in the k-12 area or somewhere totally different. 5 - That's not correct. The POI should be on the object or on the sign of the playground. 10, 11 - Thats absolutely no argument. The location should be on the object, not close to it. 14 - nope, that's wrong 16 - The correct location would be…
-
Can do more, if wanted.
-
Why should I change the title? "Edits" means that I want to edit them and not remove them. And no, they are clearly not in the correct location. That should be clear lol
-
Thats still misplaced. I mean, what Problem do you have with the correct location? Was the area abused and has more gyms than it should have? Was the correct location in an occupied cell? This honestly is an own goal for you.
-
You should actually read discussions before commenting. Im not adking to remove anything. All I want is to correct them.
-
The acceptance criteria page gives a lot of examples for god candidates: https://wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/criteria#eligibility
-
Welcome to Germany, the place where 6* nominations are getting rejected.
-
Also, the "URL/HTML" rejection reason is not meant for photos. It's meant for titles or descriptions. The supplemental information is also alright.
-
I think it is more community-based. And I personally see the PGO community as way more toxic than the ING community. At least in my area, ING players really shouldnt cheat (Multi accounting or spoofing) becausr they would get reported and suspended from the community. While in PGO, noone cares about spoofers or Multi…
-
I don't mean it like this, but for Wayfarer it's stupid since you have the same amount of nominations but need to review on two different accounts. This is way more time-consuming.
-
Thats true. But this way was propably not how you wanted it. So in this case, its bas luck.
-
Having two accounts is against the ToS of Niantic. Having two different mails but using one for PGO and one for ING is alright, but stupid.
-
I want on, but FREE xD
-
That means that the PokeStop has no image because the old one got removed because of identifiable faces or license plates.
-
Clocks are ineligible, but they were eligible earlier. Still have a lot of them in my city. Trail markers are eligible but partly hard to get approved. I personally don't submit them, as long as they have some good potential like this:
-
Some of them might be small but have a more complex meaning like destroying clusters or cell abuse.
-
Surely, but why removing misplaced Wayspots instead of all wayspots? Also, why calling new worthy objects on cemeteries eligible? This is clearly an unlogical way of dealing with this topic.
-
I mean, why using Niantic wayfarer instead of a mail/social media account in such a situation. I mean.... with the priority you have it takes at least a year until someone sees it (okay, maybe less, depending on the priority.) This must be a prank or something. At least my first thought would be to do something else. I…
-
No, current bug. Some Portals doesnt appear on the Intel.
-
No, it's not the same art. The art is the Wayspot, not the wall.
-
I do get that my submissions might not be perfect, but why they got rejected should be named in the Mail. And there stands "inappropiate location". To still answer on the possible rejections: The grevestone is in total something historical and interesting for everyone. The "speaking stones" are a perfect example of old…