Misch60-PGO
✭✭✭
Comments
-
The only thing I can say for that last one, is to zoom in a little bit more, so the trail name is a bit easier to read.
-
I don't think you are at the right place to ask, as this is not really about improving your nominations.
-
I doubt it, as the place isn't really supposed to be visited by someone right? Like, they wouldn't want people getting in there, as wastewater treatment plants aren't the safest areas.
-
Can you show the rest of the nomination perhaps, then we could see if something else was also wrong?
-
Personally, I don't see how this graffiti would qualify as a high-quality nomination to be honest. In my eyes it doesn't look unique at all. I agree the reasons given don't seem to make too much sense, but I doubt I would give this a pass myself too.
-
If you can get one approved in the area where are multiple, there is a high chance the others will follow soon after. Because reviewers then see the already existing one, and use that to also pass the next ones. So the first one is troublesome, the ones after can go pretty easily.
-
For some of them, don't include your bike or the cars at the parking place on the photos, that will make people reject them already as those objects should not be included on the photos.
-
Personally, I think this sign is not too unique. Seems too generic to me, so it really won't get a high score, if I come across something like this. Others may think different of course
-
The reason: generic store or restaurant, also often is used by reviewers for generic items. Not really what I would use it for, but it gets used very often.
-
Yeaah, this is what I expected. Some people that do agree on it, some people that don't. Good to know!
-
I have never had this happen, and I throw away nominations quite often, as there are very poor ones very often as well.
-
It's probably because it has images in it. Posts with images are checked first, before they appear.
-
Isn't this a duplicate post?
-
Well no, I wouldn't say that is the conclusion you should take. I submitted a few stops in rural areas and they get accepted. To support those areas is great to do. Spend time on whether a place is eligible is good, though of course, you can't take eternity to judge them, as there is a limit on the time you can spend to…
-
Because the photo is taken from outside the pool, and behind a fence, it could be that reviewers think it is not safely accessible for pedestrians. Not saying it is not safe, but I can see why reviewers may think that.
-
What were the rejection reasons given?
-
From what I see about this, is that is does kinda match the rejection criteria. The sign is for a certain shop, which could be seen as a generic store. Reviewers then put the rejection under that category, not because it is a shop, but because it is related to the shop in question. Not sure if I would let this sign pass…
-
Thanks everyone for commenting, it got accepted this time!
-
I fear that as long as you put restaurant in the description and title, and if it's linked a lot to the restaurant, it always will be rejected.
-
The reason it has been rejected seems to have nothing to do with the quality of your picture. The fact that it is seasonal in the reasons doesn't make complete sense to me. However, it is that the sign seems to be for a restaurant. And a generic restaurant or store is one of the reasons these nominations generally don't…
-
Is the place freely accessible, or is it only for those that need rehab? In that case, it's not freely accessible for pedestrians to visit.
-
The process of voting takes a while, that's the first point. Secondly, from my own experience, in locations where not many Wayspots are around, they pass through the voting easier than in locations with many Wayspots around. Which means in bigger cities, it takes longer than in rural areas.
-
You know how many requests people submit? The fact that there are so many submissions makes it a slow process. Even if they did it themselves, it wouldn't go much faster I am afraid.
-
Well, I can't say anything about whether or not it's true what happened, but I doubt a whole lot can be done about it. Sometimes you get unlucky with the people that judge your nomination. This is rough of course, but it's unfortunately part of the system.
-
I think it's a tough one to convince to people that they are indeed that different. It could be considered all the same playplace or something like that, and the surroundings look so similar, that reviewers might think it.
-
Is that Question Mark sculpture already a Wayspot? That spot seems to me to have a much higher chance to be accepted as a PoI.
-
Could you perhaps show a bit more from the rejected nominations, so we could see more about why it could have been rejected?
-
Are the other playgrounds at around the same place when looked from above on a map? If so, they could get rejected because they are at the same place, and seemingly are duplicates to reviewers.
-
One could also think that the pot in which it is in, is easily lifted, and moved back to the property of the people, as it does not look to be fixed at that exact spot. (I know it may be fixed, but it may look different for reviewers)
-
It could be considered by reviewers as a generic store I fear