Avatar

Nadiwereb-PGO

✭✭✭✭✭

Nadiwereb-PGO ✭✭✭✭✭

Badges

Third AnniversaryCriteria Challenge 2022Second Anniversary5 Up Votes1,000 Comments500 Insightfuls1,500 Likes250 Insightfuls1,000 Likes500 CommentsFirst Anniversary500 Likes5 Answers100 Insightfuls250 Likes100 CommentsPhotogenic100 Likes25 InsightfulsFirst Answer25 Likes5 Insightfuls10 Comments5 LikesName DropperFirst Comment

Comments

  • I think you either didn't read my comments properly or you didn't want to write this to me. I'd also appreciate if you could point out the things you think I'm wrong about, instead of making vague ad hominem attacks. Either way, rest assured that I do know what the situation is like in smaller settlements, the majority of…
  • I think this is a great nomination. The only issue I can see is that the system might automatically pull the nearby photospheres taken inside some kind of a medical facility (hair clinic?) and some less careful reviewers might reject it for mismatched location because of this. If you could make a photosphere about the…
  • No. If it's not in Ingress, it's not in the system, so it won't be a duplicate.
  • If it's not in any game, it can't be moved (because it's not in the system at all). If you nominated it and it got accepted, but didn't appear anywhere, it's because it's too close to an existing wayspot. The only thing you can do is to renominate at a slightly ifferent location, assuming the PoI is large enough.
  • If I understand you correctly, you're saying that no new submissions should be allowed at the location of previously removed ones, correct? I have several arguments against this, but i don't want to go into detail before I'm 100% sure this is what you meant.
  • It depends. If it's not available because it was too close (<20 metres) to an existing wayspot, you can renominate. (If you can place it in a legitimate location that's outside the 20m range.) If it's in Ingress, just not in Pokémon Go, you can't, because it will be marked as a duplicate. Unfortunately the only way to…
  • @keshuvats1989-PGO I'm sorry to say but your nominations are not good. The fire safety equipment and lamp are mass-produced and don't meet any criteria, so you should withdraw them and try to find actually eligible things. Your ineligible nominations will only clog down the system even more. And now let's talk about the…
  • Sorry that I have to say this, but this one is very far from being an obviously eligible nomination. If I can read it correctly, this is the logo of a motorcycle part and repair shop. Yet, you're not even mentioning it in the title/description, you're selling it as simply a mural of Taz, which looks like you're trying to…
  • If this umbrella is the logo of these childcare facilities, neither is eligible. The other one should be removed as well. (It seems to be on school ground.) On the other hand, just because something is "near" a school doesn't mean they're not eligible. As long as they're not on school property and meet criteria, they are…
  • I agree with @NMEofDeState-PGO wholeheartedly. Howeve, I also suggest that you make a proper removal appeal in Invalid Wayspots Appeals (just follow the format). That being said, if you post everything about the wayspot here - picture, location, information - we might be able to offer some insight into how and why it got…
  • First of all, I disagree. In my own community, I see that people who have only recently gotten into reviewing generally have a better, more punctual understanding of the current criteria. As a rule of thumb, reviewers who have been doing it for a long time fall into a routine, that's often against current guidelines. They…
  • Probably you're right, they could. And I'm also arguing that they should.
  • @Gajowy75-ING I'm sorry to hear that. One more thing, though: I've looked at the location on the Geoportal360 website that was linked in another discussion. It appears to me that the PoI is exactly on the border of the private property line, with at least half of it located on the public verge of grass (actually, I think…
  • That means that it's not actually upgraded, you only marked it as the next to receive an upgrade when you get one. You also have to review and get 100 agreements, that's how you get an upgrade.
  • Could you please show us your actual nomination? With title, description, photos, supporting text and everything? Without that, nobody can really provide any meaningful feedback. For example, the "Photo quality" rejection reason might be because your phone automatically generates a watermark on all photos, making it an…
  • Again, I don't have any stakes in this matter, but I keep getting notifications for it, so I'll chime in again: @minikom37-PGO, if you have evidence that the chapel belongs to either of the private residences, provide it. It is you who claims that it's invalid and should be removed, not the other way round, so asking for…
  • Why did you delete the other ones, though? You could have upgrades all of them, one after another.
  • "In Pokemon a Gym doesn't affect anything outside of it." That's not true, though. I deliberately didn't go into any more detail in my previous post beyond getting more items for bronze/silver/gold Gyms (which, as I stated earlier, can be very significant for people in areas with few wayspots), but the location of gyms…
  • Alright, so you have nothing. Have a good day, and please next time be more considerate when reporting something as fake.
  • I didn't insult you, I labeled your behaviour (reporting something as fake and accusing its submitter as a cheater without backing it up with any proper evidence or argument) as toxic and I stand by that. Also, you're moving the goalposts quite a bit here. First, you stated that the submission is a fake and that it's…
  • I know that I might be poking a wasp's nest here, but this brings up a huge discrepancy between the two games. When a Gym in Pokémon Go is (accidentally or due to a false edit/report) deleted or dowgraded to a Pokéstop, the answer in this Forum has always been that its status as a Gym cannot be reinstated. For those of you…
  • "I see a proposition that does not seems to meet criteria, while checking for duplicate. I ask on the forum how to report for further investigations such propositions." No, you stated that this is a fake from the start, and doubled down on it multiple times. You didn't say it "doesn't meet criteria", you used "'fake",…
  • My two cents (as a non-Polish outsider): Pedestrian access doesn't seem to be the bigger question here, it's obviously and definitely accessible from the grassy road and from the other side as well. What seems to be much harded to decide is whether it's on private residential property. The fence of the house to the West…
  • Not "a bit loosely". You are accusing someone of essentially cheating, just because you don't like their nomination and/or don't agree it's eligible. That's horribly toxic behaviour and I just wanted to - and continue to want to - point that out. I understand that you made a gut decision, but you were wrong. This is not…
  • I'm inclined to agree with OP. People seem to have an unrealistic standard when it comes to reastaurant and local businesses. By these standards - it should have won awards, have guide books raving about them etc. - I only know of a handful of restaurants in my whole country that would qualify, which is obviously not what…
  • Review speed varies heavily on your location. I have nominations in voting sincle last July (in a major city). On the other hand, a nomination I submitted less than 2 weeks ago in a remote village has already been approved. If your area is a slow turnover one, start reviewing yourself. That will help your own nominations…
  • To me, this particular steamroller definitely looks like a display piece, an antique that serves as a symbol for the company. My reasons for this are: The vehicle is at the exact same location on thr 2013 Street View, and even the wheels are in the exact same position (rotation-wise). This either means that the person who…
  • This is not a Wayfarer-related issue. There are subreddits (The Silph Road, for example) and other websites where there are plenty of posts about this.
  • Also, when you assign your "Upgrade next", there is a warning that it cannot be undone, so you really can't be mad about not being able to undo it. You agreed to it.
  • As lots of people told you under your previous post, this pharmacy is simply not eligible. And that is actually the first listed rejection reason as well. I agree that the photo itself is fine and it shouldn't have been rejected for that, but it doesn't meet criteria either.