NorthSeaPoet-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
You only get upgrades if you reach the sufficient amount of agreements. So, it's like that reviewers have voted differently to you OR nominations you've reviewed so far haven't resch full agreement yet.
-
I doubt level 38 players bring able to submit would make much of a difference, most players are level 40 by now, some with multiple accounts that are level 40 as well.
-
I don't think it's an out of season April Fool's. If anything, they sound very serious. Aside from it adding to the backlog, it just means that those players with multiple accounts that haven't quite reached level 40 yet will be able to submit more stuff. To as whether this is a good thing or a bad thing remains to be seen.
-
But they shouldn't have been approved in the first place, hence why OP and the base commander are trying to have them removed. NIA aren't bring reasonable, they're leaving themselves open to trouble if someone tries to access the wayspots illegally.
-
Not implying you're stupid, just going by your logic that if it can be safely accessed by someone, it must be okay, so I'll be sure to put in my supporting statements your reasoning so I can get school noticeboards approved. But wayspots on active military bases have no merit at all because the criteria clearly states that…
-
It doesn't matter if it's in a family area or not, the guidelines and criteria are clear that things on active military bases shouldn't be submitted. But if we're going to go by your logic, we might as well as start submitting noticeboards on schools, or people's fences, because we can touch them from the public streets…
-
Have you even been reading @ZombieSazza-ING 's comments? It's not a hard concept to grasp - WAYSPOTS SHOULDN'T BE ON ACTIVE MILITARY BASES.
-
No need to start getting rude just because someone pointed out that the wayspots shouldn't have even been on that base to begin with.
-
It's an issue if someone gets shot or arrested for trying to get onto the base without the proper authorisation/clearance. Portals on an active military base shouldn't have been approved in the first place.
-
I'm in the "fair" rating. Earned almost 4 upgrades since falling into fair and not seen my badge on Ingress go up. It's been stuck on 17851 for about a week now, give or take. Not amused about this 😅
-
Whilst it might not be disrespectful, it is a lazy attempt attempt at a description, and doesn't really explain the cultural or historic value of a church.
-
As @sogNinjaman-ING has pointed out, it's already is in the correct location, so there's no valid reason to move it.
-
It's only location edits that recalculate it.
-
I'm having this issue as well, as of Monday 12th October. I'm currently in London and it's still saying nothing to review.
-
Pretty much this. Sadly, the attitude of a lot players (regardless of game) is that ot should stay because "we need all the wayspots". Personally, I'm not fussed if I lose a wayspot from whatever NIA game I'm playing since despite being essentially rural, we have a lot of wayspots in my town and in the neighbouring…
-
They're not eligible as such though I would personally rate on one favourably if there's proof of it being award winning or something else tbat makes it stand out.
-
If the location is already correct, it shouldn't be moved, regardless of which game(s) the edit would benefit. In regards to the playground locatoon edits, technically, anywhere in the playground would be correct but moving it to benefit more games isnt appropriate, since it will have a possibly unintended effect on other…
-
Sounds like you hit it unlucky with the reviewers. Give it another try
-
It's corporate art, so would fail under generic business anyway, or doesn't meet criteria.
-
The vast majority of welcome signs are usually the generic mass produced ones. The artistic ones are eligible because they're usually unique to their specific area. As examples: This Bridlington welcome sign got accepted because of its artistic value as well as the fact that the imagery links to Bridlington, such as St…
-
Looks like a generic railway bridge to me. Yeah, you argue about it being part of the local history but it will most likely be rejected for not meeting criteria. If it was architecturally unique or listed in a historic building registry, such as Historic England, then it might stand a chance.
-
The first one definitely looks like it's part of a garage/car mechanic's business branding. The second Im going to assume is apart of the same building? If so, reviewers probably see it as part of the business branding like the first one.
-
Surely visually unique scores only count for the local area? So, if there are no other K6s on the map when reviewing a K6 that's been nominated, it would be "visually unique", whereas if there are several others on the map, then it wouldn't be as visually unique.
-
They're not all K6 outside of London. There's a K3 near Rhynd in Scotland. A K4 is Warrington. Let's not forget that Hull and the areas where KCOM operates have several different designs of telephone box, the only differences are the lack of the crown on top of the boxes and the fact that they're painted a creamy white…
-
Unfortunately, it's that sort of description that would cause me to reject it because it doesn't seem relevant and doesnt really explain why it has historic/cultural value.