PaulingZubat-PGO
Ambassador
Comments
-
Reverse image search does translation too. More clicks and depends on the image quality but does the job for most. Also show photos or links that are connected to the POI and may identify third party photos you've missed. Still is very frustrating to review on the phone regardless.
-
@Bballman63-PGO best to put your nominations on hold while one goes through voting so you can improve the text for the resubs. You can withdraw it too in case the first gets accepted or not want to submit it anymore.
-
I have also experienced this problem, lost an extra slot.
-
I agree that street view isn't the only avenue to verify the location of the POI, I'm also frustrated of those. We can't control the quality of reviewers, what can be fixed is how us, as submitters, can improve when asking for help. Another tactic is looking at your nominations like you are reviewing it, that means you add…
-
Through this review, I've found cemeteries that have similar memorials and shrines that may be seen as informative and okay to visit (tight security though). Nominate with discretion. Link: https://www.abmc.gov/cemeteries-memorials
-
The resolved reviews are unprecedented this time around. Probably the safer option was to reinsert previous locations rather than adding new code to newer locations, getting more bugs on top of existing ones. New countries are ideal but limitations are there. Maybe another great improvement for next time. repost from a…
-
Yep, frequency might vary due to how far you would be from the end of queue. Would be more efficient to move them though, 3 movements to each capital city.
-
If you set it on your play location, it practically catches the same reviewing pool.
-
Probably the safer option rather than adding new code to newer locations, getting more bugs on top of existing ones. If the team would've known this event's participation from the start, the poll wouldn't have been needed.
-
Probably too late now but if you ever set your bonus location there
-
I consider those under this logic: https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/11944/photo-contains-a-phone-number#latest Phone numbers, addresses, websites, and flyers
-
Is it the "Upgrade Next"? That is for when automatic upgrades are toggled on, like the next in queue for your upgrades.
-
It's not an automatic eligible POI. You have to tell something about that local business. The difficulty of conveying the eligibility is dependent on what it sells or services the business does (gyms are easy as great places to exercise, restaurants vary difficulty for every country/region but it's best to sell well). If…
-
-
It's tamer in Spain than my play location.
-
The gate might be correct for the PRP rejection assuming that "44" is a house/unit number. The discussion you linked mentions that Spain has a misunderstood with that rejection, clarified by the ambo here from the same discussion, also mentioned in this challenge, and thisarchived AMA. Due to changing criteria, uninformed…
-
Based on your username, you need 718 raids for a shiny hundo (sarcasm, in case) Those are horrible dice rolls, 1:20 is sadly per raid and not a cumulative rate. Not WF related though, come back when you searched the S2 cells.
-
I've reviewed and rejected some business signs submitted as graffiti or plaque when it is just the logo of the business. If you're trying to submit a logo, sell it as the business. I don't see how a photocopying business would meet eligibility though. Regarding municipal buildings, not all of them would meet eligibility.…
-
The toggle is at the bottom of that page you screencaped.
-
Will put this here, just in case it becomes relevant to the discussion. I only see ORC so it might be just be the lack of supporting info.
-
If I was reviewing those, I might have accepted the first ones then proceed to think that "Great candidate" might be a call sign to some voting group hence "title/description". I would then be more skeptical of succeeding nominations with the same supporting info and the general area. Consider telling more of the POI and…
-
I personally wouldn't from that photo but would reject for "submitter identifiable" if I see more of the same shoes from the same area. If you are going to reject, "submitter identifiable" would be more accurate IMO.
-
From an outsider, I dunno what that was until I searched it. Seems to be a variant of the shell route markers. Hard find but still cool.
-
I came across one nomination that said no words needed for an icon of the Santiago Camino trail. Was familiar with the yellow and blue variant but it was a small shell that looked like a survey marker. I think it should be clarified in the supporting text, a lot of reviewers may not be familiar. I have other stuff…
-
Good location for a wayspot? yes, pedestrian accessible with a bit of terrain difficulty. Good location for a gym? hardly doubt it is.
-
Putting this here so someone can go ham on these mosaic pieces.
-
another cool find, supporting text could use some work though. I worry about false duplicates for this.
-
Another review-wise good use of supporting info.
-
three sets of stairs? vs my local, LA, and the previous challenge location, it's less
-
that is a bummer.