Quinchapeces-PGO
✭✭
Quinchapeces-PGO ✭✭
Reactions
Comments
-
only 2? poor innocent, you have a lot to suffer on wayfarer hahaha
-
Because most of the people are stupid city/shitty people that can't imagine a live out of their urban sewers, they don't value historic objects or arts in towns. When I realized that, I stopped reviewing and making new proposals, it's a total waste of time, Niantic should pay us for this. If you are from a town or little…
-
Significa que te van a rechazar la propuesta, pero sin decirte ningún motivo. No tiene por qué ser así, pero así es normalmente.
-
Things in cities are accepted easier: If a residential urban building or parking wall has a s**y Bob Spongebob chalk drawing that will last 1 week, sure it's accepted. If an old rural house has in its facade an old 300yr stone cross, it's rejected bc "private property" People don't care about history or accesibility of…
-
congrats, I'm waiting an appeal from november, another from december, another from january...
-
Never, Niantic prefers newyorker flying than honest rural playing.
-
-Restaurants (even if they are famous old ones in nice antique buildings) -Cemetery outside gates (even if they have statues or an interesting stone arch with an old cross and they are easily accesible and visible from the street). But I think it's only for me, I see wayspots like these everywhere. -Ancient stone carvings…
-
Thank you very much...It was easy, now I'm feeling sooooooooooooo stupid 😂
-
Just an idea: when Niantic send the accepted wayspot email, they can add something like: "due to cells criteria, this wayspot will appear in the following games: (list) but not in (list)" I am not a technological expert, but I think this shouldn't be a high tech futurist innovation...
-
Y entonces te la rechazarán por cualquier motivo random, pero tranquilo, si apelas con un poco de suerte para 2030 te hayan aprobado el wayspot jajajaja
-
Thanks for your advice. Anyway, I'm not doing those actions when the proposal I'm reviewing is obviously a bad wayspot candidate. Just got my "today 2hr ban": I rejected, in 1 minute, a trash can, a pair of young trees and an absoluteley normal bar in a city. All obviously poor candidates from abusive users posting every…
-
I'm getting 2hours bans all the time...I vote fast but fair, looking good at proposals and making comments when reject, voting not "patterns" (like "all 5 stars"), but specific aspect of each proposal. If I get 3-4 very poor or very good proposals in a row...I know I will be banned, probably I can solve this misvoting some…
-
I try to vote on criteria, but being more flexible in locations where there are not a lot of wayspots, specially rural ones.
-
Para mí son buenas opciones si tienen algo de especial: edificio antiguo y/o bonito, premios gastronómicos, carteles o elementos llamativos, o quizás que sea el único restaurante en un pueblo y sea un lugar de reunión para la gente de allí. Es decir, no el típico macdonalds o restaurante paco de Madrid, pero igual sí un…
-
Thank you! It's nice to know about internal criteria.
-
Thanks for your comments, it's true, I need a breathe from this...And I took it. For example: Old artisan bakery, the only one in 15km-round area. Made my proposal about the breads painting (this photo is from addition info). Reviewers thought it is "a private property", obviously that's a public street and a public local.…
-
And no explaination from Niantic, of course. Rejected with no reason, try again, lose your time and make lose time to reviewers with re-re-re-re posting and making them review always the same sh**.. That's how Niantic likes wayfarer.
-
The lesson I got from this: just re-submit over and over again trying to have some luck one time, even if reviewers get annoyed of see always the same proposals, even if genuine new proposals are stuck in queues forever. It's the way Niantic likes us to do the things on Wayfarer.