Comments

• @Elijustrying-ING Yes, even I totally disagree with my earlier suggestion. Hahaha. My basic opinion has not changed from before. I think it is strange that a city PR board, which was approved by residents and placed on the side of a public street, is denied because it is on private property. Of course, this story is about…

  in Should objects on private property ALWAYS be disapproved? Comment by SeerUchan-ING September 2022
• @TheZodiac007-PGO My apologies for the delay in my reply. I see, NIA has had litigation issues in the past. Thanks for the info. My main concern is that these city PRs are being placed on the public side of the street with the residents' permission. Nevertheless, if these are to be rejected because they are on private…

  in Should objects on private property ALWAYS be disapproved? Comment by SeerUchan-ING September 2022
• Hi @WheelTrekker-ING . Thanks for the Comment. I think you are right. Btw, Please tell me one thing. About "overrules any acceptance criteria", Where is this clearly stated? I know that "must meet" is used for Acceptance Criteria and "may be entirely rejected"used for Rejection Criteria. I think this difference of…

  in Should objects on private property ALWAYS be disapproved? Comment by SeerUchan-ING August 2022
• @WheelTrekker-ING Thanks for your input. Indeed, if one simply accepts the rejection criteria, it is ineligible. However, I find it difficult to judge because it qualifies as "something that stimulates people to communicate". And I have also heard that NIA did not remove these when actually reported.

  in Should objects on private property ALWAYS be disapproved? Comment by SeerUchan-ING August 2022
• It's true that I don't see the options I think I see often enough. I agree with the opinion that it seems to be AI. Thanks.

  in About the contents of the specific label list. Comment by SeerUchan-ING August 2021