SlicedPeas-ING
✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
Yeah, take a photosphere and post it with your rejection email.
-
I dug up the link for you.
-
Scanning is for their AR+ project in order to show things in real world situations through the camera. It has nothing to do with wayfarer or removing anything.
-
Scanning has nothing to do with wayfarer, the scans are not viewed by the wayfarer team and scanning will not help remove a non existent poi. Please chant this five times and tell everyone you know.
-
And just a minor quibble, but should be addressed, it's not a mural. I'm not even sure how to classify it, signet maybe? But clearly not a mural. Sell things as what they are rather than trying to append some known class of acceptable object to something that clearly isn't that.
-
The poi is the playground, not the piece of ground it sits on. The playground is no longer there, so the poi is no longer valid.
-
Hmm, this appears to be an advertisement, with a misplaced pin and text requesting that the pin stay misplaced. You're right, the reviewers should have all reported you for abuse instead of just rejecting it.
-
1*, boring as they come.
-
I agree these are not special, but I also agree that you should just reject them. That's how the system works.
-
When location edits first got added to user reviews, people asked for a supporting statement(and still do) but Niantic was emphatic about not adding that because they wanted move edits to happen without influence. So using the description or title edit is basically two forms of abuse, it's not what it is for, but you're…
-
" I had some nominations that I submitted at a park that were accepted but were a tad too close to another stop in the game, so I suggested it be moved over just enough to show up in Pokemon Go" Bingo. Don't do that.
-
No. I've been playing disc for 25 years and the last thing we need is non players showing up and gathering around a basket for a raid or to anchor a baf or anything. I don't want to have to worry about a bunch of people staring at their phones being on the course where I'm throwing 175 gram discs at high speed. Do not…
-
Yes, but the reviewers who reviewed it appear to have disagreed.
-
Not any more, the emails have changed. Check to see if you have a key.
-
And again, I'll point out that adding "must one star all categories to reject" will just result in that being added as a shortcut to browser plug-ins and so you'll mostly inconvenience those not using those tools. It's a very bad idea.
-
They are two different objects, but CPPPaP mozajka is clearly mislocated to the opposite side of the building.
-
It wouldn't matter if you forced those clicks anyway, WF+ would just add a 1* keyboard shortcut anyway.
-
Not only are there limitations to the tools that reviewers work with, there are some serious issues with the whole "it's a large object so any where on it is good" because that's not always true. A church submitted with a picture of the front of the church, but the pin located in the back? That doesn't work. The pin is…
-
The reason that annoys people is two-fold. First, is that isn't relevant. The lack of a nearby wayspot is not a criteria. The second is being single game centric to a system that affects 3 global games, with three more in beta.
-
See, you're doing it again. This is why you get rejected.
-
"It's not a school" Description mentions teaching and students. It's a school.
-
I don't think it's a terrible poi, but trying to rules lawyer it in as a bridge has a couple problems. The main one being that it isn't a bridge. It's just not. The second is that rules lawyering is annoying and offensive to reviewers, so you shouldn't do that. Just submit it simply as a spillway overlook without…
-
Reviewing for Niantic is intelligence analysis training. Too funny.
-
I think it's fine, the bench right there can serve as a proxy as easily as a sign.
-
For someone who thinks they know so much about ingress you seem very unaware of the fact that limited access portals have existed since early times and have been used specifically for that purpose. And there are six games, not three.