Avatar

Theisman-ING

✭✭✭✭✭

Theisman-ING ✭✭✭✭✭

Badges

Third AnniversarySecond Anniversary500 Insightfuls1,500 LikesFirst Anniversary1,000 Likes5 Answers250 Insightfuls500 Comments500 LikesPhotogenicFirst Answer250 Likes100 Insightfuls100 Likes100 Comments25 Insightfuls25 LikesCombo Breaker5 Likes5 Insightfuls10 CommentsName DropperFirst Comment

Comments

  • What do you mean its not a rejection criteria ? Its on the rejection criteria page !
  • Because its always been a no no for adult only places, it still is in the new guidelines, it says Location is an adult-oriented store or service, such as a liquor store, **** range, firearm store, or provides **** and/or adult content.
  • Nope, still not grasping my point You would, I hope, never accept anything on a K12 location. Why are you saying that that rejection reason is set in stone, but the one above it regarding mass produced generic objects can be waived if you want ? Its not pick and choose on the rejection reasons and only apply the ones you…
  • Ok lets transpose the words mass produced for K12 location then. K-12 locations can fill other eligibility criteria. In those cases "k-12 location " is not a reason for rejection." See what im getting at ? You can't just pick and choose which bits of rejection reasons to ignore
  • Sorry but rejection reasons must weigh more than eligibility reasons otherwise using that logic you can justify accepting a mural on a wall of a school building. Its art and visually unique, lets just ignore the fact it doesn't meet eligibility criteria on location. Or a sculpture in the middle of a roundabout, totally…
  • As @sogNinjaman-ING said, generic UK footpath, bridleway etc signs are totally generic mass produced and trash submissions, instant 1*
  • Whilst the rejection reason may be wrong, based on the information you've supplied theres absolutely no reason to accept it as a POI either. As I have said on another thread, as harsh as it may be, memorial benches generally mean pretty much nothing to anyone except close family and friends, the community as a whole just…
  • You don't have to go into detail on what happened but you do have to go into detail on why they were significant to the community as a whole not just local friends and family. As harsh as it may be, memorial benches generally mean pretty much nothing to anyone except close family and friends, the community as a whole just…
  • How many times have you failed, if its just the once then yes you can retake it in 30 days. If its twice, then no you can not retake the test.
  • Military bases were made ineligible one one of the past Ingress AMA's, which had been reiterated on the Ingress Forums when Wayfarer was OPR, and then was also reconfirmed on a couple of threads on the Wayfarer forum by @NianticCasey-ING . However, and this is quite a big however, they never bothered to update the criteria…
  • Why? If people failed to follow the criteria last time, why does changing it mean that they will follow the criteria this time ?
  • Actually there are 2 definitions of visually unique on Wayfarer, which can be contradictory in nature for things like trail markers etc. On the help section its defined as you have stated above, but on the review section itself its defined as "Visually Unique A visually unique nomination should not be something that is…
  • Actually what you've said isn't entirely correct. It now says "Carefully consider the eligibility criteria, along with the acceptance criteria, rejection criteria, and content guidelines, when evaluating nominations." Just because it meets acceptance criteria does not instantly mean the rejection criteria no longer applies.
  • TLDR - don't resubmit it its never going to pass. For a more in depth answer and clarity I'll answer the rejection reasons individually for you. Temporary / seasonal Reviewers would have marked it as such due to the fact its not a fixed (at least it doesn't appear to be from your pictures) point of interest. Most Little…
  • Out of interest where exactly does it say that because I cant see it on the criteria list ?
  • I don't think number of reviewers is the reason for the delay you experienced, more that it split the reviewer base and it required more and more people to review it until a consensus was met. I'll be honest, I'm 50/50 on it myself. Your running into a few perception issues as well which aren't going to help your cause.…
  • I still fail to see how a university, especially in this case being one about buisness management, being placed under exploration. The definition they use for exploration is "A place you love to venture out to; a destination or a placemark of local interest and importance and which makes our communities unique and shapes…
  • Previously you would have been correcr but now "An institute for higher learning" is no longer in the criteria.
  • The submission as you have presented it just does not meet any of the criteria you have failed to raisw any valid criteria that you believe it does meet. To clarify the points you have raised It's a place where people interact - not a valid criteria, people interact everywhere, sidewalks, carparks etc. learn - in this…
  • @cyndiepooh-ING , its easy to see why libraries would fall under the exploration category. The category itself says "A place you love to venture out to; a destination or a placemark of local interest and importance and which makes our communities unique and shapes its identity. Somewhere or something that tells the unique…
  • What of the new criteria does it meet ? Its a business management university. Its not a great place for exploration, its not a place for exercise, its not a place to be social. Other specific areas on the university campus may well meet one of the criteria, but just being a post graduate site isn't enough on its own.
  • Duplicate post
  • Oh I haven't even started on being condescending towards you but if you want me to start I'm more than happy to oblige. Well considering you've titled the submission as a cemetery, which is straight off of the do not submit list, I'd say my advice to you to read the guidlines was well warranted. Your submission was…
  • It is your responsibility to provide the information its not the responsibility of the reviewers to have to search for the information to see if it is correct. You keep expecting reviewers to do your work for you, you should provide this information when making the submission.
  • Two things One the web link doesnt work Two, and this is the main one, cemeteries are specifically mentioned as do not submit. Its still metioned in the new criteria rejection criteria. Ineligible location, place, or object Sensitive locations like gravestones (not associated with a significant/historical figure) and…
  • For a start the trail has an official name, why didnt you include it ? If I can, eventually, find it from searching for it then surely you should have included it in the description or title to help confirm its validity. Reviewers should already have this information made available to them from the submitter, they…
  • No, this is meant to be a place to help the Wayfarer community, a place for guidance, advice and constructive criticism. A coal section is the equivalent of pointing at someone who is different to oneself and laughing at them. Its not constructive or helpful and can be insulting and borderline abusive in some instances.…
  • I looked into both of the submissions and to give you the TLDR on them both. Trail marker - partially your own fault in not supplying enough information to confirm its valid. Old School - its not a notable building, its not a community gathering place, hidden gem or a hyper spot and old doesn't inatantly mean acceptable.…
  • Its an advertisement for one of the sign and crafts sections in the mall It may look visually appealing, but its a temporary advertisement so its an instant 1* rejection
  • There is not a huge problem, if there was then the ability to review would be taken away from us all. If it was as huge a problem as people continually make it out to be on these forums don't you think Niantic would have done something to protect their investment ? They have previously already investigated this issue and…