WheelTrekker-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
Other games don't matter, if they are missplaced in one game it means that they are missplaced in Wayfarer, they are wrong in every game and they must be fixed in every game. The rest of the players can nominate the real wayspots at their real location and they'll keep in mind what has happened previously before any of…
-
A good way to prevent abuse is to act strongly. Instead of wasting time trying to check everything, clear it up and act on the offenders. That would prevent other people trying to do the same. If the only penalty for abuse is that the wrong wayspots are relocated then many people will say, Why not? Let's try to fill the…
-
The first title "Dishforth Primary School (car park)" tells everyone clearly that you should read the eligibility criteria. If you spend some time reading existing suggestions for other users will help you a lot in order to understand Wayfarer.
-
It's Niantic the one that thinks that it's impossible to walk on a road without sidewalk.
-
You second post starts with "Niantic's AI ..." And this thread is about appeals. Appeals are handled by humans so whatever follows in your message doesn't apply here.
-
It might be better if you use the Nomination Improvement section https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/categories/nomination-improvement-advice Just reading through the existing posts might give you ideas about possible candidates and how to present them.
-
Niantic doesn't care that military locations are totally forbidden places outside USA.
-
I think that they mean that this could be an issue similar to this one https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/comment/223278/#Comment_223278 Whenever there are lots of wayspots nicely layed along the grid this suspicious.
-
Niantic never encouraged players to use the app to submit nominations.
-
So we have finally found the reason why you want this wayspot removed: because the other faction uses it and you can't access it.
-
There's no API and they will never provide any way to get the info that you want.
-
You have confirmed that it breaks the rules and it should be removed.
-
According to your photo, the removed one doesn't have safe pedestrian access.
-
Usually it's not possible to reverse an appeal, although sometimes they have done so. You can try to ask for help from the ambassadors to check if they agree that this seems wrong, for example @Elijustrying-ING @kawin240-ING @PkmnTrainerJ-ING Maybe there's some other issue with your nomination and appealing won't work.
-
The rejection that Niantic sent didn't claim anything about private property. If they are gonna reject something, at least they should base their rejection on real reasons according to the rejection criteria and don't add new mystery reasons.
-
You should take a look at a post from one of the ambassadors, I think that it was Eli, were they wrote a huge list of issues that they have been raising and working with Niantic.
-
That rejection reason doesn't make any sense. It has been written/copied by a person hired by Niantic to manually review the nominations and rejecting it as "is inside an inacessible area" while reports to remove location inside military facilities are rejected.
-
Children-> No.
-
As in your other posts, this one lacks any rejection reason, so it looks like it was rejected by Niantic, not the community. Has all of them been rejected mostly at the same time? That used to be a sign that your account has been reviewed and they mass rejected your pending nominations. If they are rejected at different…
-
BTW, Niantic should adjust better their AI so it doesn't reject photos because they have "too much green" and add a first step basic classification to detect these watermarks and reject them with a proper rejection email. Detecting these watermarks should be a piece of cake for the most basic vision algorithms, and I guess…
-
If it isn't a watermark, Why is it called Watermark in the camera app settings?
-
Just as you think that the Niantic employee has made a mistake by rejecting this appeal, other people might think that they made a mistake by approving your previous appeal of a similar wayspot. The term "mass produced" might not be the proper one as certainly that's the outcome of a single person printing that sheet,…
-
If it's two streets away, isn't the proper request to edit the location to the real one instead of requesting its removal?
-
@gorgi1978-PGO and @BaltiCalling-ING are right. That doesn't look at all like any official information sign, it's a sheet of paper with generic info about electric lines, printed without any information about the entity that put that sign there, a new frame without any wear of time. According to the little information that…
-
Sobre el número de respuestas puede influir que escribas en español en un foro internacional donde la gente habla principalmente en inglés. Sobre tu mensaje, esa nominación no parece cumplir ninguno de los tres criterios actuales de aceptación por lo que el que alguien elija un motivo incorrecto de rechazo debería ser el…
-
Pogomap is useless. When you go to that location open the nomination screen and look at the existing wayspots, it will show everything.
-
An horizontal photo would be much better to show only the 1861 and show the context in the supporting photo.
-
You have to wait 30 days for each new appeal. You'll be able to appeal the latest nomination at the end of August
-
If I had to guess I would say that someone marked it as bad quality photo because the main photo is too far away, with too many other elements instead of focusing more on the building, and the supporting photo doesn't show the nominated wayspot. Using only the current main photo as a reference, step closer to take a new…