sogNinjaman-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
sogNinjaman-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
Comments
-
If it is a School then Niantic say in their criteria that school buildings that cater for students 18 yrs old and younger are not eligible and nominations on school sites should be rejected using the "K-12" reason. You local community were correct to refuse your nomination. Have a read of both the acceptance and rejection…
-
Pubs in the UK are always referred to as "the heart of the community", particularly when someone wants to close one down and convert it into a house. They are normally the one potential Waypoint you can find in most villages anywhere in the UK, and most of them qualify as "historic", as in the meaning of "historic" used in…
-
I tend to agree that at least some of these are "not eligible" from what I can see of your single photos. If you want proper comments, we need to see the full set of photos and text for each nomination, so we can see what the reviewers see. Make a new thread for each Waypoint or it gets confusing keeping track of comments.
-
No 1 - generic, uninteresting footbridge - 1* - does not meet criteria. No 2 - As a "Village Shop" - it is never going to get through - 1* does not meet criteria. You need to submit this as "Broadmayne Post Office" and make sure at least one of your photos shows the post office sign on the wall clearly. Then it should go…
-
Once again, Niantic put events for different games on the same day. Do they realise that quite a lot of people play more than one of their games. It should really be rotational, and ensure there are no event clashes of any sort across all games. Poor planning again. No to a Wayfarer "Community Day". What would we do -…
-
It means - "perhaps people decided to pick a different rejection reason instead of the "undistinguished cafe, does not meet criteria" rejection I would have chosen for this. Now, if you had called it the Golf Club Club House and got a better photo of a "Golf Club Clubhouse" that would be different, Niantic say we can…
-
Looks like a "generic shop / restaurant" to me. Which of the 3 main Niantic acceptance criteria does it meet? Is it a good place to excercise, to get fit or to socialise. "Lack of nearby Pokestops" is not a valid reason that a nomination should be accepted. Take the Niantic challenge, go and explore, there appear to be…
-
** cough ** https://lightship.dev/
-
Should this not be removed as an "Invalis Waypoint on PRP"?
-
Perhaps people are reviewing it as another "undistinguished cafe - serves coffee - community deserves more Stops" type generic nomination?
-
-
Simple. If the Portal was in the middle of the lake then it lacks "Pedestrian Access". As for other existing portals or Waypoints in similar aquatic locations that might have been acceptable in earlier times or just sneaked in through poor or "greedy" reviewing, those too are now invalid because of a lack of pedestrian…
-
That's not a "Park Entrance Sign", it's a "no littering / dogs" sign. Nominate the playground.
-
The location edit has moved the Pokestop from an S17 cell where it was the only Waypoint into a different S17 cell already containing 2 existing Waypoints, which means it will not appear in Pokemon Go as the cell is "full". The location is also within 20m of an existing Waypoints, so again this will not allow the Pokestop…
-
Does not look eligible at all to me.
-
Remember all those complaints after Niantic removed the "temporary pandemic 80m spin radius" and put it back to 20m. That would be nothing compared to the tidal wave of hysteria that would be genarated if Niantic made Pokestops work in a similar way to Portals and PoGo players were limited to 4 spins of a stop every 4…
-
Pokestops moved by an edit fall under the "new" S17 cell rules. Under the old rules, you could have more than one Pokestop in an S17 cell, under the new rules brough in because of location edit abuse, you can not. If you move a Pokestop and the cell in which it is placed already had another Pokestop that appears in game,…
-
First off, forget what particular legal definition of "private property" applies in your locality. For the purpose of Waypoinints and reviews, the only thing we are meant to use are the Niantic criteria. Your comments / confusion about "Strata Properties" being "private" property are essentially covered by Niantic criteria…
-
It's on a roundabout with no pedestrian access, so an invalid nomination.
-
One. Otherwise you end up with the type of submissions I have seen where people try to nominate the goalposts at each end of a soccer pitch as separate Waypoints ("North Goalposts / South Goalposts").
-
Make sure your Nomination photo shows nothing more than the plaque, otherwise you may get some people rejecting it for "generic business" if too much of the shop / pharmacy is in view.
-
I can't actually **** a statue in these photos. You may need some better photos showing the Waypoint in more detail before Niantic can evaluate the rejection appeal correctly. Edit comment. Apparently, the starred out wording on my first comment was "ma-ke ou-t". Really Niantic?
-
From looking at your photos it is really hard to give a proper opinion on either. We need to see your full Nomination with both photos and a location, because in both cases the main issue would seem to be - "are these nominations on PRP or not".
-
Whether or not a nomination is on "private property" or not is not an issue, as most property belongs to someone. All that Niantic ask to be considered is "Is the submission on Private Residential Property" - i.e. is the property in question only used as the residence by a single family. If it is, then it is invalid under…
-
"Education" if Wayfarers currently consistes of a set of criteria, some of which are very vague, published by Niantic. While there are lot og good suggestions posted aboive, they all fall down because of the refusal of Niantic to provide any feedback to the reviewing community. Without feedback, improvement is very hard to…
-
No. Most likely the S17 cell where the Stop is located already has another "in-game Stop" available.
-
Looks like a "generic bench" to me.
-
Which Niantic criteria do they meet? I don't see these as a great place to be social, to explore or to get fit. "1* - Does not meet criteria" rejection for me.
-
I have no problem with the two photos you posted, these would both make legitimate Waypoints - No 1 is a "nature sign" and No 2 is a "Park". However, the "Weber Haus" photo is neither of these, it is an advert / directional sign "to" a potential POI . Apples and oranges - you can't compare the two or try to use the…
-
Expect this quote to be regularly bandied about as "proof" that "xxxx" should be rejected........ 😉
