spiesr-ING
✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
Not meeting the criteria to be approved is not one of the removal criteria.
-
You need to include a screenshot of the email rejecting your removal request in order to appeal that decision here.
-
Please post the entire submission. Neighborhood signs generally aren't eligible. Your description doesn't provide anything to show why this one in particular would be. You didn't post your supporting statement, so I don't know if you made a compelling argument there or not.
-
That isn't a valid reason to remove a Wayspot. (Also there is no way for you to know that it is "bugged". The decision of which Wayspots get used for which games is solely that of that game's developer. The are no rules, only observed patterns. This Wayspot not conforming to said patterns is not necessarily evidence of a…
-
Please follow the correct format for your post. Wayspots are not required to be publicly accessible. Only certain types of private property (like schools or single family residences) are grounds for removal.
-
If you want it to be considered as separate Wayspot then it needs to meet the criteria on its own. It can't borrow the church's eligibility unless you are merely using its image and location as that for the Wayspot for the church itself.
-
I see you are submitting via Go, so let's get the obvious out of the way first. Have you checked Ingress/the Intel map to see if the things you are submitting isn't already a Wayspot that simply isn't in Go?
-
You cannot appeal a rejected submission. This subforum is only for appealing declined removal requests, or removed Wayspots.
-
If you actually want feedback and aren't just here to complain you need to post your submissions. (The entire submission that is: both photos, title, description, supporting statement, location; everything that reviewers would see.)
-
None of the above. They still are not acceptable. However "not meeting the acceptance criteria" is not one of the removal criteria. Neither is photo related problems. There is no new precedent here. Things that have been wrongfully approved not being able to be removed unless they meet one the specific removal criteria is…
-
You are in the wrong subforum. This one is for getting feedback from other uses on specific submission candidates.
-
Please disable your phone's watermark.
-
Are you nominating the library or the plaque?
-
The exterior walls of a building are definitely part of the property. (At least as far as Wayfarer is concerned.)
-
If the building that this is on is a residence, then you don't. No Wayspots are allowed on Private Residential Property, period. The proximity to the sidewalk doesn't matter.
-
Post the entire submission if you want feedback.
-
You can upload a photosphere to Google Maps using the Street View app. Or you can use your supporting photo to make it clear where the POI is in relation to things that are visible on the old street view and mention that this was painted after to street view was taken in your supporting statement. If you want feedback…
-
This is the appeals section. You cannot appeal a rejected submission. If you want feedback on your submission head over to the Nomination Improvement section instead.
-
The line between ineligible graffiti and eligible street art is a blurry and subjective one, but for me this falls on the ineligible side. I recommend that you do not resubmit.
-
You are mistaken. The purpose of Wayfarer is to develope the Wayspot database, not to create pokestops. Not all Wayspots will be used in all games.
-
There is a randomized delay between when you submit something and when it is truly "live" in Wayfarer. An upgrade will not be applied until that delay passes.
-
Per Niantic, private residential property extends all the way to the street, even if the city technically owns the boulevard.
-
Is the building visible in the background a single family residence? If so then, since they falls between that property and the street, this would be ineligible as PRP.
-
We need to see your entire nomination in order to answer that.