yanghao1-ING
✭✭
Comments
-
As a signpost for a natural feature it qualified.
-
I just got a wayfarer submit with an Adopt sign. This one is an "Adopt a Stream" program. Since it's a signpost about a natural feature I didn't reject it. Also on the map look around it seems that another "Adopt a Stream" sign was already accepted .
-
There is one person in the Vancouver area also submitting survey markers around the city. For the supporting photo the submitter places "leaves" around the marker and text posts a weblink to an ingress thread from Nov 2019 about them being eligible. They can be clearly seen in the supporting photo however the map photo is…
-
Is it possible get an official decision on the adopt signs? Just seen another submit. This time the sign was called "Adopt a Spot". I've reviewed a few since I started this thread and have rejected them with the following remark: "At this time Niantic has not given an answer if these adopt signs should are eligible.…
-
If you go into the Nomination Management section of wayfarer and take screenshots of the rejected waypoints it would help people looking at this thread determine why it was rejected. Just saying "it meets criteria" in a comment isn't enough.
-
If it's been rejected maybe finding something else to submit in the area might be better? Like survey markers. They are used for mapping and I've seen many of them are now waypoints. They look like hockey pucks in the ground. They are usually dated etc. Unless the new criteria doesn't allow them.
-
It looks like I'm running into these adopt a street signs more and more so I looked into them. They are at least two year commitment and can be more. two types family/individual and business organization. Volunteers must come around once a month to clean the street of trash/litter. It does promote "community" and exercise.…
-
In a case with a watermark in the photo I just select the "Submitter Identifiable" option because it says: "Use for nominations where the photo includes extraneous objects or identifiers that may not necessarily be part of the object." The wording suggests to me that the watermark in the photo is an identifier that is not…
-
Thanks for your input. Here is a surrounding photo and not the submit photo of one of the sign submits I've come across. The first thing that struck me was the adopt a road person hasn't raked the leaves yet😂. It is safe access for pedestrians . It's not cultural or unique or historic. It's not on private property. My…
-
I was thinking more along the lines of security issues as well. It's a border between two countries. Having people hanging around the border to play an AR game might not be a good idea. Thanks for your information.
-
Thanks for the info. I won’t use the skip button on them in the future.