0X00FF00-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
0X00FF00-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: How much weight do you put on the description?
Reminder. Do NOT reject a nomination based on a boring/bland description: (View Post) -
Re: How to accurately rate fake/home submissions?
If it's an obvious attempt to try and create a fake "couch" wayspot? Nip that in the bud, call it "abuse" asap. If it's something eligible but unfortunately located, it "just… (View Post) -
Re: 5 Star Honeypots are a good idea
Back in the OPR days, they'd described it as roughly this: a minimum number of votes must be cast a minimum average "acceptance score" threshold had to be met for the location to be accepte… (View Post) -
Re: Parts of a sports field?
A part-of-Thing CAN be nominated and accepted separately from Thing, but with at least these caveats: The "part" must itself be acceptable on its own individual merit We are specifically ma… (View Post) -
Re: Bans for submitting invalid nominations?
Given that my last nomination was deemed to be have "explicit or inappropriate activity" despite being merely the quite very unique signage for a winery, and that its greatest sin was that … (View Post)