0X00FF00-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
0X00FF00-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Prison
Based on the comment by @NianticGiffard above, this POI should have been rejected. And as “prison” rules would apply exactly the same way as their “K12” rules, it would also meet their “removal due t… (View Post) -
Re: Lessons learnt from trail marker submissions
Reviewers also love photospheres, because trail junctures are generally never near roadways. Reviewers also hate photos that show any perspective (near! far!), so even when the photo ends up being su… (View Post) -
Re: What happens when a reviewer rejects with "abuse" as the reason?
DON’T mark such marker nominations as “abuse”, keeping these points in mind: survey markers WERE explicitly allowed as 4* nominations previously Andrew Krug confirmed (with an official blessing from … (View Post) -
Re: Seeing more Scanner [REDACTED] reviews lately
Niantic's Wayfarer does not have "honeypots". ALL nominations are submitted by players. Rather, you're conflating a different thing. Or at best you're using a misnomer. The tl;dr is, due to… (View Post)Post edited by 0X00FF00-ING on -
Re: New "Private residential property" definition
No. "Associated with" means exactly "associated with". "Belonging" is something you are throwing into the mix, not Niantic. (View Post)