Nope, that’s the one. Let’s take it in parts: things (ie LFLs) on the sidewalk and/or near the sidewalk are not ineligible merely for being “near” PRP things ON the PRP are ineligible, even if they a… (View Post)

We had a clarification from @NianticGiffard some time back, perhaps somebody else has bookmarked it and can find it for you. In many municipalities, such as the vast majority of Canada and the USA, a… (View Post)

I would think the issue actually boiled down to, you took a photo of a photo, and that that photo came up when they did a reverse image google search. If @NianticGiffard can explain that difference t… (View Post)

Quote from @NianticGiffard himself, "If an eligible object is on the sidewalk or near a sidewalk that is not interfering with a single-family residence then it is acceptable." This answerin… (View Post)

@k6nch6n-PGO can you provide any specific examples? Relatively recently, Niantic staff publicly stated in these forums that items on the “easement” (aka boulevard) ARE NOT on sfprp, as that bit of la… (View Post)