0X00FF00-ING
✭✭✭✭✭
0X00FF00-ING ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: What is the point ??
By "here" you mean "there": https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/categories/removal-appeals And of course the obligatory note that you will need to include a lot of informat… (View Post) -
Re: What happens when a reviewer rejects with "abuse" as the reason?
DON’T mark such marker nominations as “abuse”, keeping these points in mind: survey markers WERE explicitly allowed as 4* nominations previously Andrew Krug confirmed (with an official blessing from … (View Post) -
Re: Wayspots on private properties
Argh. I've just been had a nomination rejected again, with all the spurious reasons that are easily* refuted: "... appears to be on private residential property ..." It’s on multi-family pr… (View Post) -
Re: Discussion Thread: Photo Reviews
Hopefully photo reviewers realize that you can be somewhat LESS stringent when accepting a secondary photo. Too many times I've had to resort to submitting a "daytime" photo for a nominatio… (View Post) -
Re: Scout and Guide Huts
@YouLostAStar-ING re: the "#2" you say is incorrect. See: Exclusively Scouting activities = automatic reject under K12 Not-exclusively = potentially eligible. The quibbling, at best, is fro… (View Post)