52cucumbers-ING
✭✭✭✭
52cucumbers-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Nominating a new waypoint with bad 4G signal!
Use a satelite phone. Use a friend who climbs up a tree to get receiption and shares WiFi. Use a second phone on a pole that shares WiFi. Use a drone carrying a phone that shares WiFi. Use a helicopt… (View Post) -
Re: Are churches eligible?
It's marked as not one but two churches on google maps so to me this looks like lazy reviewing. https://www.google.com/maps/place/R.+Silvano+Ferreira+Santos,+65+-+Porto+Novo/@-20.289948,-40.3759434,2… (View Post) -
Re: Upgrades are trash
I've seen claims that upgraded nominations get reviewers from a wider (geographically) audience and I suppose in many parts of Europe that can mean reviewers who don't understand the language in the … (View Post) -
Re: Stop asking for "pokestops" in supporting information!
Judge the nomination based on the nominated object. The supporting information box is there for just that, supporting information. If they use it to complain about the lack of POIs that's their choic… (View Post) -
Re: This is litterally the fourth time I have a footbridge rejected for being a natural feature
@TWVer-ING So let's look at the acceptance criteria and compare to the "bridge" pictured further up in this thread. Must meet at least one of the three eligibility criteria A great place fo… (View Post)