52cucumbers-ING
✭✭✭✭
52cucumbers-ING ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: New pokestop/gym requests being disapproved even though they are eligible.
So it shouldn't be a problem to include a screenshot of where the nomination was located then, so we can rule out that possibility. If these signs are very common the only other issue I can see is th… (View Post) -
Re: New pokestop/gym requests being disapproved even though they are eligible.
Are you telling the reviewers to not move the position of the nomination because you're playing tricks with already full S2 cells because that's what it looks like in the supporting information? I'll… (View Post) -
Re: This is litterally the fourth time I have a footbridge rejected for being a natural feature
Niantic literally stated that they still want personal judgement to be part of the review process when they announced the 3.1 criteria. (View Post) -
Re: Stop asking for "pokestops" in supporting information!
Judge the nomination based on the nominated object. The supporting information box is there for just that, supporting information. If they use it to complain about the lack of POIs that's their choic… (View Post) -
Re: This is litterally the fourth time I have a footbridge rejected for being a natural feature
@TWVer-ING So let's look at the acceptance criteria and compare to the "bridge" pictured further up in this thread. Must meet at least one of the three eligibility criteria A great place fo… (View Post)