Ark4242-PGO
✭✭✭
Ark4242-PGO ✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: safe to reach on foot
Without seeing the nomination, I couldn't say for sure if it should be accepted, but I don't think something like this should be rejected for the pedestrian access reason. There's been plenty of disc… (View Post) -
Re: safe to reach on foot
The acceptance criteria says "Must be safe and publicly accessible by pedestrians (indoor or outdoor)" and I take this to mean that you have to be able to walk there. If it requires climbin… (View Post) -
Re: Anyone else getting rejection fatigue?
Update: The public park I had was accepted on the 3rd try. Never give up. And then at a different park where the "Park Name North Entrance" is a stop, and the park is pretty large, I had &q… (View Post) -
Re: Anyone else getting rejection fatigue?
separating the databases isn't needed. I agree, it isn't needed, and I never suggested it should be. Maybe somebody else in this thread or in general. I think the only thing I was pointing out was th… (View Post) -
Re: Anyone else getting rejection fatigue?
I've had a public park rejected twice now. It's in my queue for the 3rd time waiting for an upgrade. Nothing you can do about it really. It still seems like there's a ton of people out there who just… (View Post)