On what grounds? As stated above, it doesn't appear to be eligible, and your argument to deliberately misplace them, means they are in an hindering location to begin with. (View Post)

if the description and support text refer to that I’d probably be fine with it yes. We were only shown the picture and none of that screams trail marker nor is the trail name clear/obvious from it, e… (View Post)

Fwiw - response from Belgium. For one very brief period I've seen them go through in under 48h without upgrade. I've heard of multiple people around my area of them going over a year since. Usually, … (View Post)

They can be acceptable yes, if the person has a significant historical value (at least locally). That said, 'historically' I tend to take as 'a long time ago', and not graves from the last 25 years o… (View Post)

These are why you have an 'abuse' option in the reasons to 1* it... (View Post)