I personally think that they can only be acceptable as a point for exploration. For that they need to be rare so; Victorian, Edwardian or Gold Painted Olympic boxes. Everything else is a reject for m… (View Post)

I assume you are not aware that everyone who is reviewing nominations has actually taken and passed a test to prove that they know what they are doing and understand the criteria for acceptance. Wher… (View Post)

I agree it's a wasted nomination. This object does not meet any eligibility criteria whatsoever and has correctly been rejected. The only questionable thing here is the rejection criteria. "Othe… (View Post)

This clearly fake nomination just came through my review list. I don't know how anyone thought they would get away with this. The main image used is lifted directly off the Wikipedia page for Little … (View Post)

Literally the first sentence in the rejection criteria states; "The object is mass-produced, generic, or not visually unique or interesting." I personally can't see how anyone would conside… (View Post)