BochumJules-PGO
✭✭✭✭
BochumJules-PGO ✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Doesn't Niantic have clear rules? Appeals rejected !
I'm not even talking about the sticker. and to briefly bring this up for discussion. As the submitter has already correctly explained, these "stickers" are a special type of sticker, which,… (View Post) -
Re: Doesn't Niantic have clear rules? Appeals rejected !
That doesn't answer my question. Name reasons for rejecting obvious wayspots, such as churches, museums, monuments, cycle paths, etc., if they do not have to be accepted!? (View Post) -
Re: Doesn't Niantic have clear rules? Appeals rejected !
💁🏻♂️Yes exactly, THIS IS THE RESULT, otherwise it wouldn't be called "acceptance" criteria!!! Again, if everything were a "can and nothing has to" you wouldn't need the criteria.… (View Post) -
Re: Doesn't Niantic have clear rules? Appeals rejected !
That's not true at all! The criteria clearly state that if several criteria for acceptance are met, including a safe location/access, then this is to be accepted, with examples. Nothing says that you… (View Post) -
Re: Doesn't Niantic have clear rules? Appeals rejected !
But this is an official mark. If you cut them off and someone sees you doing it, then that is property damage and will result in a criminal complaint. If you look it up, you can also unscrew signs or… (View Post)
