CVRIM-ING
✭✭✭
CVRIM-ING ✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: INVALID INGRESS PORTAL (no safe pedestrian access)
keep your thoughts to yourself, dreamer) if for your company it is the norm to pour snot because of the distant crooked portals, then this does not mean that everyone is doing this ... omg (View Post) -
Re: INVALID INGRESS PORTAL (no safe pedestrian access)
you are protecting the point for your own ends ... there is no reason for this poi to exist, since it violates the criterion of secure access. Stop pecking, it's not pretty (View Post) -
Re: INVALID INGRESS PORTAL (no safe pedestrian access)
There is no walkway that should be according to the criteria, so I think poi should be removed .... (View Post) -
Re: INVALID INGRESS PORTAL (no safe pedestrian access)
ok, maybe i'm wrong, then to figure it out, you can give an example, which wayspot does not meet the requirement for safe pedestrian access? (View Post) -
Re: INVALID INGRESS PORTAL (no safe pedestrian access)
Why invent some meanings of your own? in the text of the criterion it is directly written how it should be ... (View Post)